Inspired by Driving Miss Daisy, the 1989 American comedy drama film, I borrowed its title to headline this article.
Coincidentally, the film’s theme – grappling with enduring racial and social divides -- resonates with today’s pressing realities. In a time when racial tensions and societal polarization are again at the forefront, especially following the 2024 U.S. election, these issues continue to reshape the American landscape.
Prediction 1: The Rise of Tambaloslos et al.
I have been watching Sara Duterte’s political journey for quite some time. Back in my November 28, 2021 ATABAY article Letter To Inday Sara Supporter Who Is Also My Friend, I made a prediction right before the 2022 presidential election about her political predicament. Here’s an excerpt:
“Bongbong is running under the umbrella of multiple parties with a throng of vested interests. Aiming now for the 2028 presidency is a horde of younger and ambitious breed of second-generation leaders [spearheaded by no less than what Sara has called the tambaloslos] emerging from a band of dynastic political clans embedded in Bongbong’s camp."
“My friend, at this point, if ever you find that Leni’s presidency offers a much better prospect for Sara’s presidential run in 2028 [hinting at Rep. Joey Salceda’s Robredo-Sara tandem (RoSa) then], such a conclusion is not a product of a tricky analysis of Sara’s predicament, but as an insight I am sharing with you personally as your friend.”
Prediction 2: The Breakup of UniTeam
Despite earlier signs of divergence, Sara ultimately aligned herself with Bongbong Marcos, forging the formidable UniTeam. At the time, I likened their coalition to the biblical Goliath in my November 14, 2021 ATABAY article:
“Goliath was too big, too heavy, and too clumsy to be missed by David.
“'Putting his hand into his bag, [David] took out a stone, slung it and struck [Goliath] on the forehead; it penetrated his forehead and he fell on his face to the ground.' (1 Samuel 17:49)"
Back then, I thought the stone that could fell the political Goliath was the vote for Leni. In reality, however, it was a stone from within Goliath himself – internal ambition, like a kidney stone, started as a mere irritation. It escalated into excruciating political pain, requiring drastic surgical measures, and ultimately led to the dissolution of the UniTeam alliance.
Speculation: The Case of the Missing P125 Million Confidential Fund
This next segment ventures into speculation, drawing from my September 30, 2023, ATABAY article, Risa to Sara on P125 M Spent in 11 Days: “Saan Niyo Dinala Ang Pera?:
Speaking of ‘spending spree,’ I thought the unthinkable phrase P125 Million spent in 11 days would sound clearer if we illustrated it with a more understandable hypothetical scenario.
With playful story line, I used Bing AI to compile this hypothetical spending spree over 11 days.
Day 1: Purchase a luxury car -- a Bentley Flying Spur 2023 -- for P40M.
Day 2: Acquire a Neige Hermes Faubourg Birkin bag for P20M.
Day 3-5: Book the Shangri-La Makati’s presidential suite three nights at P600K per night and splurge on Armani suits, iPhones, and other gadgets.
Day 6: Hire a private yacht for a day cruise at P100K per hour.
Day 7-9: Host friends at Palawan’s Banwa Private Island Resort for three nights at P5M per night
Day 10: Return to Manila to purchase an Amorsolo painting for P10 M.
Day 11: Use the remainder to buy a condominium.
While this speculative list is lighthearted, journalist Jarius Bondoc exposed real and eyebrow-raising details in his Philstar column.
“Duterte as VP had no confidential funds for 2022. That’s because predecessor VP Leni Robredo had not asked for any in July 2016-June 2022. Yet MalacaƱang gave Duterte un-programmed P125 million in December 2022.
“Duterte used it up in 11 days, Dec. 21-31, including Christmas, Rizal Day, and New Year’s Eve holidays.
“Expenses included P16-million rentals of 34 ‘safe houses.’ Rates ranged from P45,000 to P250,000 a day, costlier than posh Boracay. Half-a-million pesos went to one lessor for 11 days. A million went to another for four days.”
Ilonggos have the expression for such a superabundance: Ti abaw kwarta ya namon ginapiko ginapala gid ya pro. In Tatay Digong’s lingo: Magdadala ako ng maraming pera. Sako kung meron.
Bondoc hit upon Sara’s pera, not in sako, but in duffel bags as excerpted below:
“OVP special disbursing officer Gina Acosta made four cash withdrawals, P125 million each, totaling P500 million between December 2022 and September 2023.
“Tellers found unusual her and four companions’ taking cash over the counter in three or four duffel bags. No armored cars, no security arrangements.
“Tellers at the branch near DepEd recounted SDO Fajarda thrice withdrawing P37.5 million each, totaling P112.5 million in 2023. Assisted by one male, Fajarda stuffed the cash in two duffel bags and walked out the fire exit.”
Even my wife, a retired bank officer, was puzzled. She remarked that withdrawing such large amounts typically requires armored cars and security guards.
The Fear Factor
To understand the brazenness behind such actions, we must revisit an enduring hallmark of the Duterte era: Fear. Feeling harbored by Duterte brand, his minions thumbed their noses at the public frozen with fear. In a CNN interview, Bob Woodward reflected on the view of power by Donald Trump, who said:
“Real power is fear. You have to scare people.”
Similarly, Maria Ressa once asked President Rodrigo Duterte, known as the Trump of Asia:
“Is it important that people be afraid of you?”
His reply?
“Fear…there must be fear.”
This philosophy of governance, rooted in fear, draws a striking parallel between Trump’s America and Duterte’s Philippines. Both leaders wielded fear to consolidate power, enabling their closest minions to act with impunity. As H.L. Mencken once noted:
“The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed (and hence clamorous to be led to safety) by menacing it with an endless series of hobgoblins” – [like drug addicts and immigrants.]
Or as George Orwell aptly put it:
“Political language is designed to make lies sound truthful and murder [like extra-judicial killings] respectable, and to give an appearance of solidity to pure wind.”
It’s noteworthy that the Washington Post’s fact-checkers documented 30,573 false or misleading claims during Trump’s first presidential term, an average of about 21 per day. (Wikipedia)
Conclusion
The unraveling of Bongbong and Sara’s UniTeam reflects broader issues within Philippine politics – dynasties, unchecked ambition, and a culture of fear that freezes society into complacency. While the Duterte brand once commanded awe, its legacy now faces increasing scrutiny.
The Philippine government may struggle to manage the aftermath of both Tatay Digong and his daughter, Inday Sara. For now, they remain emblematic of a system deeply entrenched in fear and excess – a system crying out for change.
Content & editing put together in collaboration with ChatGPT
Head collage photo courtesy of Canva, Wikipedia, & The Adobo Chronicles
Still photos courtesy of Rappler, Facebook, Get Real Post, Reuters, Amazon.com, & Philippine Star