Let me say it plainly: the kind of leaders our country desperately needs—those with integrity, competence, and a genuine heart for service—are choosing not to run. And they’re telling us early.
“Ngayon pa lang sinasabi ko na sa inyo: 2028, hindi ako tatakbo,” declared Pasig Mayor Vico Sotto during his inauguration.
Former Vice President Leni Robredo, through her longtime spokesperson Atty. Barry Gutierrez confirmed the same: no plans for 2028.
And so, the million-dollar question echoes louder than ever: Why?
I believe the answer lies in two ghosts haunting our democracy: the election process and the electorate itself.
The Ghost of the Process: The Day After
Let me take you back to the day after the 2022 presidential election. I wrote a piece titled An Engineer’s Inkling on the Election Issue. It wasn’t a political rant—it was a technical reflection. I’m an engineer, after all. And what I saw in the number didn’t add up.
Columnist Rigoberto Tiglao in the Manila Times had predicted, with uncanny precision, a 16 million vote margin between Bongbong Marcos Jr. and Leni Robredo—seventeen days before the election. That’s not just foresight. That’s mathematical clairvoyance.
When I checked the actual tallies from Philippine Star and CNN Philippines, the numbers matched. It was a feat that involved three unknowns:
• Total number of voters
• Marcos Jr. voters
• Robredo voters
Tiglao even broke it down:
• 5 million soft Robredo votes flipping
• 1 million command votes defecting
• 6 million joining bandwagon
• 4 million collapsing (whatever that means)
Total: 16 million
Spectacular? Yes. But, also suspicious.
Then came the viral video—a simulated mini-election showing how a transparency server could be hacked. I consulted an IT expert friend. He confirmed: Yes, it could be done. The source code could be altered to follow a fixed pattern.
And then came the IP address that shouldn’t exist: 192.168.0.2. A private node. Untraceable. Yet it had transmitted nearly 10% of Metro Manila’s results—plus Cavite, Batangas, and others—within the first hour after polls closed.
Eliseo Rio, former DICT Secretary, laid it bare:
• 39, 512 precincts transmitted 20.6 million votes in just 53 minutes.
• That’s 746 ERs per minute, or 12.4 per second.
• A world record.
• And yet, in second hour, rate dropped to 446 ERs per minute.
• Comelec couldn’t explain the sudden slowdown.
This wasn’t just a glitch. It was choreography. A digital ballet performed at impossible speed—then abruptly slowed. And no one asked why. Ugh.
The Ghost of the Electorate: When Memory Fails and Popularity Prevails
Now let’s talk about the other ghost—the electorate.
CLTG Builders, owned by Bong Go’s father, bagged P816 million worth of infrastructure projects in 2017 through joint ventures with the Discayas. By the end of that year, their contracts ballooned to over P3 billion.
Despite the optics, despite the proximity to power, despite the unanswered questions— the voters raised his hand. In the last senatorial race, Bong Go, despite controversies surrounding CLTG Builders and its billion-peso contracts in Davao, emerged as the number one senator.
This isn’t just about one candidate. It’s about a pattern:
• Where name recall trumps track record
• Where shenanigans are shrugged off as strategy
• Where the electorate forgets faster than the system can fail
When Waters Rise, So Must Accountability
The recent flood control corruption scandal has only deepened the wound. Senator Lacson’s exposé revealed ghost projects, kickbacks, and budget insertions that siphoned billions from public coffers.
Bong Go’s CLTG case foreshadowed this. The mechanisms were the same:
• Contractor monopolies
• Political patronage
• Opaque bidding process
And the consequences? Flooded streets, ruined livelihoods, and the haunting knowledge that P1.9 trillion may have been misappropriated over 15 years.
Ghosts’ Fingerprints – Identical is the Clue
Eerily, the ghosts left behind fingerprints—uncannily identical, unmistakably deliberate.
In the 2022 presidential elections, those fingerprints were digital. Columnist Jarius Bondoc in the Philippine Star revealed the vote tallies in several Manila precincts that bore a disturbing pattern.
The rest of the presidential candidates received similarly uniform vote counts—an absurdity that defies statistical logic.
“Statistically impossible,” said former DICT Secretary Eliseo Rio. “It could only have been done by manipulation.” He pointed out that even seasoned public figures like Senator Panfilo Lacson and boxing icon-turned-senator Manny Pacquiao received zero votes in dozens of precincts—an outcome that strains credulity.
“Anyone with average IQ will easily see fraud in the identical votes,” Rio added. ‘Did someone arbitrarily assign numbers to the five [presidential candidates]?”
The implication was chilling: not just error, but orchestration.
Fast forward to the present flood control scandal, and the fingerprints reappear—this time, manually etched into public records. Investigative journalist Iris Gonzales, also writing for The Philippine Star, exposed a similar pattern in her column Splitting Contracts: The Secret to Corruption.
She obtained a copy of the DPWH’s Post-Contract Award Disclosure for January 2024, detailing 83 projects under the Bulacan First District Engineer’s Office. What she found was startling.
Six projects under Riverbank Protection Structures along Balagtas River were each priced at P96.499 million. Ten more projects were identically tagged at P77.199 million. And across the full list of 83, the amounts followed a distinct, repetitive pattern.
The symmetry was too perfect. The numbers too neat. The fingerprints too familiar.
Whether etched in code or inked in contracts, the ghosts of corruption leave behind the same calling card: identical figures that defy randomness and insult reason.
And so, who would dare to run?
When Silence Speaks Louder Than Campaigns
Vico Sotto and Leni Robredo are stepping back not because they lack courage. They are stepping aside because the system itself seems unwilling to meet courage halfway. When elections become theater and governance a game of patronage, even the most principled contenders must ask: Is it worth entering a race where the rules are rigged and the referees are silent?
Their refusal to run is not surrender—it is a mirror. It reflects the brokenness we’ve tolerated, the shortcuts we’ve normalized, and the trust we’ve crumpled.
If we truly want leaders who serve rather than perform, who build rather than brand, then we must do more than lament their absence. We must earn their presence
The election process, haunted by the ghosts of 2022, offers no assurance of fairness. The electorate, meanwhile, has shown a troubling tolerance for shenanigans—elevating figures like Bong Go to the top of the senatorial race despite the billion-peso CLTG Builders controversy.
This is not cynicism. It is realism. And for leaders who value integrity, realism is a compass—not a cage.
Their decision not to run is both a silent protest and a quiet handwriting on the wall. It tells us, with sobering clarity, that unless we confront the ghosts—unless we demand transparency, accountability, and discernment—our democracy will remain a stage for spectacle, not substance.
A Quiet Reckoning
If you’ve read this far, thank you. This piece was not written to provoke, but to pause. Not to accuse, but to awaken.
I write not as a pundit, but as a citizen—an engineer by training, a storyteller by calling, and a Filipino by heart—who still believes that truth, once spoken with sincerity, can ripple outward and restore what’s been lost.
The stories we’ve traced—from digital fingerprints to flood-soaked contracts—are not just about systems. They are about us. About what we tolerate, what we forget, and what we dare to hope.
The stepping back of our most capable leaders is not the end of the story. It is a challenge to write a better one.
So, I invite you—not just to reflect, but to respond. In your own way. In your own time. Whether through conversation, conviction, or quiet resolve.
Democracy is not a spectacle we watch. It is a legacy we shape.
Content & editing put together in collaboration with Bing Microsoft AI-powered Co-pilot
Head collage photos courtesy of The Times of Israel; design by Canva
Still photos courtesy of YouTube, Facebook, Wikipedia, Rappler, Property Report PH, People Asia, Reuters, Carlos Rodriguez/ANDES, mazurcatholicnews.org.uk