Tuesday, 5 December 2023

MSU: WHY THERE?


 

“MSU sees exodus of students after deadly bomb attack” - Rappler

Why was MSU bombed?

Why was MSU put up in Muslim land?

Why do students go to MSU?

The trio above could be among the many questions that could come to anyone’s mind after reading the headline.

The first question could be based on the cold hard fact that amid the global conflicts such as the Israel-Hamas war, MSU is nothing more than a benign school of innocent students, faculty, and staff. The second question could be derived from the nagging feeling about the deep-rooted polarity between Christians and Muslims. The third question could be put simply: “Why study there?” For the bombing victims, it has ultimately come to a point of life and death situation.

The first two questions, I will leave to the minds of the experts, analysts, and chroniclers.

The third question: “Why do students go to MSU?” I think I could make out the gist since I was on campus as an engineering student from 1971 up to my graduation in 1976.


Looking back, I graduated First Honor at Lagao Elementary School in General Santos City. After graduation, my mother took me along on a vacation in Iloilo, as my prize, to pay a visit to my brothers and sisters studying there.

Still basking in the sunshine of my achievement like any typical proud mother, she couldn’t help but talk about me around the neighborhood.

I heard one neighbor tell my mother: “Your bright boy must study in UP High” -- words that echoed then in my mind constantly.

One morning, I found myself in a classroom of students, so different – in image and bearing -- from my elementary schoolmates. For the first time, I felt overwhelmed after picking up tidbits of personal information: heirs to wealthy families, scions of political clans, first and second honors, and so on. One graduated from International School and spoke like an American I had watched only in a movie.

Everyone seemed to hold their breath when I told my UP high school freshman class that I came from Mindanao – the only one. I told them my father’s job: a rice mill operator – unintentionally wrong choice of word. My father was a mechanic. Somehow that covered up our poor family status. Only for a while. My absence in the cafeteria during break times later on took the wraps off my financial distress.

To cut this short (you may read the whole story in my ATABAY article “My Life-Changing Year In UP”), I found myself, one morning, eating my first meal after coming back home. I was devouring hungrily a braised pork belly -- nalipasan ng gutom (let hunger go by) for a year -- while my mother, a dressmaker, sewing a neighbor’s dress in her old Singer sewing machine, was watching me with moist eyes.

Being poor and, by a twist of fate, having gotten in the world of the well-to-do, affected my psyche particularly my academic performance. The tough break shot down Sherlock Holmes’ claim that the brain works better on an empty stomach.  The best I did -- came off Number 11 in our freshman class of 40 in one grading period.

My mother enrolled me the next school year in our local school, MSU Prep High. I graduated as a Valedictorian. The recurring question “Where to go to college” triggered in my mind the haunting words “Your bright boy must study in UP High” which sparked me off to study at UP Diliman.

I took the government exam for the “poor and deserving” high school graduates and earned my wings as a National State Scholar. I thought it would be my vehicle driving me to reach my dream. I was mistaken. The state scholarship could hardly foot the bill for my living expenses in Manila.

In the nick of time, the MSU Scholarship came on the scene. Like a manna from heaven, it granted me a Full Scholar status.

The rest is history.


My parents were poor. That all of us seven siblings graduated in college, two with doctorates, three with masters, and the rest professionals, in various fields, has always been the cherished conversation topic over our family dinner table.

My parents were poor. Lacing through such a reality, this is the common thread that weaves the fabric of the academic journeys of most, if not all, MSUans particularly the victims of the recent bombing. Sad to say, the deaths and injuries have kept coming up against the question: “Why were they there?”

Many years back, I recall two traumatic incidents in MSU – a war and a bombing. At the height of the war, we got a glimpse of a battle tank and armored personnel carrier rolling around the campus with soldiers in full combat gear. All at once, we got an earful of distant explosions from the skirmishes between the government forces and the rebels.

During the evacuation, suffering from a high fever, I rode the school bus in a convoy of vehicles to Iligan City. The school and the Iligan community, closing ranks to deal with the crisis, billeted the student evacuees to various accommodations. I was lodged in Rhodora Apartment where Ma’am Loable took care of me until I got well and back on my feet. Most, if not all student evacuees went back to the campus when classes resumed.

In the bombing incident, grenades exploded right in the middle of the performance of the local band in a folk-rock live concert. I decided to stay on campus until the situation went back to normal.

During those dreadful incidents, I never thought of going home. The two-way fare for me then was too expensive. A dewy-eyed snippet: going home, one student said he would miss his bed and a locker in his dorm -- he had none of those luxuries at home.

Further on, I could only form a picture of him missing the Garces’ pakbet, mani and turon. Or, the foggy morning run, winding up in a drink of fresh cow’s milk in Aggie Farm. Or, the late afternoon stroll on the golf course with the landscape of the fairway rolling on the terrain of the grass sloping down the next green. Or, the sundown sight of sunflowers that seemed to soak up the last rays of sunset. Or...

Why there? For the “poor and deserving” students in the middle of their academic journey, to turn around means to take the risk of falling down from the tightrope walk on their respective paths in life. Taking aim at their goals, the only way is for them to walk forward, whatever it takes, under the aegis of MSU, my alma mater.


Head collage courtesy of free stock photos

Video clips courtesy of  YouTube

Saturday, 2 December 2023

TAYLOR SWIFT AND TRAVIS KELCE: THE POWER COUPLE THAT SHOOK THE WORLD


 

“Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce hold hands, confirming their relationship status all too well” – Los Angeles Times

It’s been only two months since Taylor Swift and Travis Kelce confirmed their relationship, but they have become one of the most talked-about couples in the world. The pop superstar and the NFL star have been making headlines with their whirlwind romance, their DDA (digital display of affection), and their support for each other’s careers.

FIRST MEETING

“It all started with a friendship bracelet,” kicked off the Glamour’s celebrity news. The 34-year-old NFL tight end (if you’re a “Swiftie” better start picking up football lingos) attempted to give the 33-year-old pop star his number via friendship bracelet during a stop on the Eras Tour.

“I was disappointed that she doesn’t talk before or after her shows because she has to save her voice for the 44 songs that she sings,” Kelce said in his podcast with his brother. “So, I was a little butt-hurt I didn’t get to hand her one of the bracelets I made for her. She doesn’t meet anybody, or at least she didn’t want to meet me, so I took it personal.” She accepted his offer to attend a Kansas City Chiefs game later, and things have moved fairly quickly from there.

Since then, the couple has been inseparable, despite their busy schedules. They have been traveling across the globe to see each other, with Kelce flying over 11,000 miles to see Swift perform in Buenos Aires, Argentina. Swift also spent time with Kelce in Kansas City, where she bonded with his teammates’ wives and girlfriends.


MOVING IN

She will move in with him for good if all goes well with their “playing house” at his $6 million mansion. Their friends have claimed the couple have even discussed starting a family.

Swift and Kelce’s relationship has not only captured the hearts of their fans but also boosted their respective industries. Swift’s Eras Tour has been a huge success, breaking records for attendance and revenue. Kelce’s performance on the football field has been stellar, earning him praise and accolades.

US Magazine on celebrity news bannered that Swift and Kelce’s romance is making “swifties” out of (almost) all of Hollywood. CBS TV personality Gayle King’s words embody the typical reactions among Hollywood luminaries in need of such a romance.

“People say, ‘Oh, it’s a publicity stunt!’ I don’t think that. I think they’re two young people who are attracted to each other and I think they’re trying to figure it out, whether it goes somewhere [or] doesn’t go somewhere.”

WINNING

Actor Morgan Freeman said, laughing, that though he doesn’t think about them at all raised this pivotal question, “Are you winning? … That’s what I’m interested in.” If he’s talking about Kelce’s performance, this headline is a good barometer: “Taylor Swift cheers for Travis Kelce, spurring Kansas City Chiefs to four consecutive wins as a lucky mascot.” Kelce also set a new NFL record for reaching 11,000 receiving yards in the fewest number of games (154) as a tight end. If Freeman was talking about the marketing aspect, let’s hear it from the NFL marketing executive:

“This thing happened like this… Travis went to her concert and asked her to maybe come to a game. We had no idea that she was going to show up. And once it happened, she showed up to a game and in an instant, literally in a second, it’s viral … All you can do is be there and be ready for the moment. When it happened, we were ready to roll with content like ‘Football 101 for Swifties.’”

The bottom line: Getting “written and posted about” is the main goal.


Actress and filmmaker Olive Wilde made her thought-provoking exceptional comment which could be the reason for the word “almost” in the banner phrase “(almost) all of Hollywood”:

“I wish Taylor Swift was in love with a climate scientist.”

A QUIXOTIC HEADLINE

The essence of such a striking comment stirred up my fertile imagination. I prompted Bing, my AI-powered co-pilot to write a hypothetical report with a catchy title on the current update about the headline-grabbing relationship between Taylor Swift and her new heartthrob, who happens to be, tadah, a climate scientist. Here’s the report:

Taylor Swift and Dr. James Hansen: The Eco-Couple That Saved the Planet

It’s been a year since Taylor Swift and Dr. James Hansen tied the knot in a secret ceremony, but they have already made a huge impact on the world. The pop icon and the climate scientist have been working together to raise awareness and action on the climate crisis, and to promote green solutions for a sustainable future.

Swift and Hansen met in 2022 when Swift attended a lecture by Hansen at Columbia University, where he is a professor and the director of the Program on Climate Science, Awareness, and Solutions. Swift was impressed by Hansen’s passion and expertise and approached him after the lecture to express her admiration and interest. The two hit it off and exchanged contacts, and soon started dating.

Since then, the couple has been unstoppable, combining their talents and influence to make a difference. Swift has dedicated her music and platform to spreading the message of climate action and has donated millions of dollars to various environmental organizations and initiatives. Hansen has continued his research and advocacy and has collaborated with Swift on several projects, such as a documentary, a podcast, and a book.

The couple has also been inspiring others to join their cause and adopt eco-friendly lifestyles and practices. They have launched a campaign called “Swift Change”, which encourages people to reduce their carbon footprint, support renewable energy sources, and demand climate justice. They have also been vocal about their own green choices, such as driving electric cars, using solar panels, and eating plant-based diets.

Swift and Hansen’s relationship has not only captured the attention of the media and the public but also influenced the policies and decisions of governments and corporations. The couple has been invited to speak at various global events and forums, such as the United Nations Climate Change Conference, the World Economic Forum, and the Nobel Peace Prize Ceremony. They have also met with several world leaders and CEOs, and have urged them to take urgent and bold actions to combat the climate crisis.

Swift and Hansen have shown the world that love can transcend boundaries, and that it can motivate and empower people to work for a common goal. They have also shown that they are not afraid to use their voices and resources and to challenge the status quo and the vested interests. They are truly an eco-couple that saved the planet.

Wrapping this up, Bill Belichick, NFL Patriots football head coach, says, “I would say Travis Kelce’s had a lot of big catches in his career. This would be the biggest.”

For Taylor Swift, maybe, not yet. Some climate scientist could still be flying in the air for her to catch.

Happy Weekend Everyone!


Content put together in collaboration with Microsoft Bing AI-powered co-pilot

Head photo courtesy of TMZ

Video clips courtesy of YouTube

Tuesday, 28 November 2023

Q* UNCOVERED: THE NEW AI MODEL THAT CAN REASON LIKE A HUMAN


 

Project Q* reportedly is one of the reasons behind the controversial sacking of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. What is Project Q*?  We invited a tech expert, Mr. AI, to uncover this mysterious new OpenAI model that has gotten the tech world talking.

ME: Good day, everyone! Welcome to Tech Talk. Today, I’m glad to have with us a tech expert who will expound on the recent breakthrough Q* (pronounced as “Q-Star”). Please help me welcome our special guest, Mr. AI.

MR AI: Thank you for having me in your show. I look forward to answering your questions on Q*.

ME: Thank you too, Mr. AI. It’s a pleasure to have you here. So, let’s start with the basics. What is Q*?

MR AI: Imagine a machine that can solve any mathematical problem that you throw at it, without any human guidance or feedback. A machine that can figure out the rules and logic of mathematics by itself, and apply them to different situations. A machine that can demonstrate advanced reasoning capabilities similar to humans, and perhaps even surpass them.

ME: Wow, that sounds like science fiction.

MR AI: Well, not anymore. Meet Q*, the new AI model.

ME: How does Q* learn by itself?

MR AI: Q* uses a reinforcement learning algorithm called Q-learning, a method that allows an agent to learn the value of an action in a particular state based on the rewards and penalties it receives from the environment.

ME: I see. That sounds very complex and sophisticated. How do you know that Q* is actually solving the problems correctly and not just guessing or cheating?

MR AI: Well, Q* is a black-box model that does not explain how it solves mathematical problems or what rules and logic it follows. This makes it difficult to verify, validate, or audit its output and processes. However, research has tested Q* on various types of problems and data sets, and has compared its performance with other AI models and human experts, and found it can achieve a high accuracy and consistency in solving mathematical problems.

ME: That’s very impressive. So, Q* is a significant leap towards the goal of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI), which is a hypothetical capability of AI that makes it perform any intellectual task that the human brain can do. Is that correct?

MR AI: Yes, that’s correct. Q* can be seen as a milestone in the history and development of mathematics and its application, as it can solve problems that have puzzled or challenged humans for centuries.

ME: That’s amazing. But, Q* has also been creating ripples in the AI community, as well as some fears and controversies. Some staff members at OpenAI have reportedly expressed their concerns about the safety and ethics of Q*, as they believe the model could pose a threat to humanity if it is not properly controlled and regulated.

They have also questioned the decision of OpenAI’s board of directors to fire Sam Altman, the co-founder, and CEO, who was allegedly working on a secret project related to Q*. Altman has since been reinstated as the CEO after a revolt by the staff and the support of Microsoft which has invested $10 billion in OpenAI and has a partnership with Q*. What do you think about these issues?

MR AI: Well, these are very valid and crucial issues that need to be addressed and discussed. Q* is a powerful and potentially dangerous tool that can be used for good or evil, depending on the intentions and actions of the users and the developers. Q* also raises many ethical and social questions, such as what is the meaning and purpose of mathematics, and what is the role and responsibility of humans about Q*. These are not easy questions to answer, and they require a lot of dialogue and debate among different stakeholders, such as scientists, engineers, policymakers, and the public.

ME: That’s a thought-provoking insight.


MR AI: I think humanity should adopt a balanced and proactive approach to deal with Q*, and leverage its strengths and opportunities, while also addressing its weaknesses and threats.

ME: That reminds me of SWOT analysis in college.

MR AI: You hit the nail on the head. It can help us assess the internal and external factors that may create opportunities or risks for humanity about Q*. For example, one of humanity’s strengths is its rich and diverse culture and history of mathematics and its applications which can inspire our interactions with Q*. On the flip side, humanity’s weakness is its limited resources and capabilities to control and regulate Q* which may expose people to potential harms or wrongs caused by Q* or by others who have access to Q*.

Another of humanity’s strengths is its strong sense of curiosity, creativity, and innovation which can enable us to learn and collaborate with Q*. On the flip side, humanity’s weakness is its biases and prejudices that may affect its perception and judgment of Q* which may lead people to overestimate or underestimate Q*’s abilities and impacts.

ME: That’s an illuminating deep dive into those deep-rooted issues.

MR AI: Here’s one aspect at play that has to do with the Sam Altman firing and reinstatement jumble. No doubt, humanity has a high level of intelligence, reasoning, and problem-solving skills which can help it understand and evaluate Q*’s output and processes. On the flip side, humanity’s weakness is its conflicting interests and values that create tensions and disputes among different stakeholders such as researchers, engineers, investors, policymakers, and the public, regarding the use and development of Q*.

ME: I agree with you, Mr. AI. Q* is a game-changing breakthrough, but also a formidable challenge for humanity. Any final words to our viewers?

MR AI: Q* can be a powerful tool for education, research, and innovation which can help humanity solve complex mathematical problems and discover new patterns and insights. However, Q* can be a grave weapon of destruction, manipulation, and domination which can be used for malicious and unethical purposes, such as hacking, cyberattacks, warfare, and terrorism.

Q* can be a catalyst for collaboration, communication, and creativity, which can foster a culture of curiosity, exploration, and experimentation. However, Q* can be a germ of confusion, deception, and alienation, which can create false and misleading information, such as fake news, propaganda, and deepfakes, that can influence and manipulate public opinion and behavior.

Q* can be a source of empowerment, inclusion, and diversity, which can democratize access to mathematical knowledge and skills. However, Q* can be a challenge to human identity, dignity, and values, which can raise existential and philosophical questions.

ME: Phew, that’s a heavy stuff. That is to say, it is up to us to decide how we will use it and what we will make of it. We should not fear Q*, but neither should we blindly trust it. We should embrace Q*, but also question it. We should learn from Q*, but also teach it.

MR AI: That’s very well said. Q* is not just a problem, but also a solution. Q* is not just a machine, but also a partner. Q* is not just an AI, but also a part of us.

ME: Thank you, Mr. AI, for your insightful and enlightening answers. It was a pleasure to have you on our show. And thank you, Dear Viewers, for watching Tech Talk. I hope you enjoyed this episode and learned something new.

Until next time, this is Tech Talk, signing off.


Content put together in collaboration with Microsoft Bing AI-powered co-pilot

Head photo courtesy of Pixabay

Video clips courtesy of YouTube

Saturday, 25 November 2023

THE RETURN OF RODY DUTERTE: A VIEW THRU SPIRITUAL EYEGLASSES


 

“Rodrigo Duterte threatens return to Philippine politics if daughter impeached” (South China Morning Post)

Amid lots of the same headlines, I chose the one above due to the word “threatens.” It spotlighted Duterte’s forewarning “Mapipilitan akong lumabas sa retirement… talagang magkababuyan tayo” aimed at the House of Representatives which he called the “most rotten institution” after it had stripped his daughter VP Sara of confidential and intelligence funds.

Looking at a greater height, so as not to miss the forest for the trees, have you ever wondered how Duterte’s threat is psyching out and frightening the Filipino people? Such a terror-stricken threat jumpstarts ghastly memories of his direful regime.

                                                THE PIETA PHOTO


“I knew this night was different. A police cordon blocked off journalists and bystanders, as Jennilyn Olayres grieved over the lifeless body of her partner Michael Siaron. The murderers left a sign that read ‘I am a drug pusher, do not copy,’ as a crowd, mostly composed of Manila castaways, mingled…

“As a news photographer, it was my job to document what was happening, but a part of me that heard Olayres’s pleas for help also died a little. It was raw and gut-wrenching, but I could do nothing but press the shutter button.

“’That’s enough! And help us!’ she cried out to media workers, authorities, and onlookers.

“’What are you waiting for?’ I asked a policeman who shrugged before retorting, 'We can’t do anything as he is already dead.'” (Raffy Lerma)

                                                 THE KIAN STORY


Kian was a 17-year-old boy in a poor family of four siblings. His mother worked as a domestic helper in Saudi Arabia, while his father operated a sari-sari store that Kian minded from 5:30 a.m. to 12:00 noon every day before he went to school. After closing the store at night, he would usually walk around the block for some small talk with neighborhood friends.

Perhaps it was during one of those walks when he was shot by the police operatives – one of the thousands (6,000+ per gov’t to 30,000 per CHR/ICC figure) killed in the drug war.

            “Tama na po! May exam pa ako bukas!” Kian begged for mercy before he was killed.

What passing that test could have meant to Kian? A handful of kid stuff could have meant a promising future for his whole family.

A step closer to his dream of no longer using cooking oil when giving a massage to his father.

A step closer to his dream of uniting his family with his mother giving up her overseas work as a domestic helper.

A step closer to his dream of having a bed for each of his family’s siblings.

A step closer to his dream of expanding the sari-sari store that has supported his whole family.

A step closer to his dream of being a policeman. What an irony.

                                            THE JOURNALIST MEMOIR


“Every day, for a period of a little more than seven months beginning in 2016, the Philippine Daily Inquirer maintained what it called Kill List. It was a public record of the dead, fed by reports from correspondents across the country. The circumstances of death were brief. The entries were numbered and chronological. The locations were limited to towns, cities, and provinces, without the specificity of street addresses. Names were recorded when they were available, numbers were used when they were not.

“The first ‘unidentified suspected drug pusher,’ for example, was killed on July 1, the first day of Rodrigo Duterte’s administration, the same morning that Jimmy Reformado, fifth most wanted drug pusher in the city of Tiaong was shot by ‘unknown hitmen’ …

“’Unknown hitmen’ was a common phrase, but it was the nature of their victims – suspected drug pusher, suspected drug dealer, at large on drug charges, on the drug list, most wanted – that demonstrated that what was occurring was far from random. These were targeted killings, as President Duterte had promised, directed against ‘people who would threaten to destroy my country.’

“The methods were limited only by the killers’ imaginations. There was the man ‘found dead after being abducted from his house.’ There were the three ’found dead in a canal, blinded and hogtied.’ There was the man ‘shot in the head in his bedroom’ and the man killed at seven in the morning ‘in front of his daughter’s elementary school.’

“The constancy and sheer velocity required its own nomenclature. They were drug-related deaths. They were illegal killings. They were targeted assassinations, salvaging, body dumps, drive-by shootings…

“There is language for this phenomenon. The term is ‘extrajudicial killings’… The repetition forced a shorthand – EJK. The press used it as a qualifier. The victims’ families used it as a verb. The critics used it as an accusation…

“This is a book about the dead, and the people who are left behind. It is also a personal story, written in my own voice, as a citizen of a nation I cannot recognize as my own. The thousands who died were killed with the permission of my people. I am writing this book because I refuse to offer mine.”

(Excerpted from Prologue of Patricia Evangelista’s book Some People Need Killing: A Memoir of Murder In My Country)


WHAT DO I SEE?

Eight months before the 2022 Presidential election, I wrote in my ATABAY article What Do I See? the following insight:

Question: Why did God give PH, the “Light of Asia” (Pope John Paul II prayer) a ruler who insulted Pope Francis and called God stupid?

Answer: “[God] PUNISHED [His people] by delivering them to their attackers…” (2 Kings 17:20, emphasis mine); “When God wants to judge a nation, He gives them wicked rulers.” (John Calvin). Cardinal Sin affirmed Calvin’s assertion with Marcos [Sr.] and his Martial Law as Exhibit A. Thus, to punish, God has given PH such kind of ruler today.

Why? 1 in 4 Pinoys is below the poverty line. PH, for being the “Light of Asia” has angered God as He was with Sodom that “DID NOT HELP THE POOR.” (Ezekiel 16:49, emphasis mine).

[Jesus’ words in this Sunday Gospel are serendipitous: “Truly I tell you, whatever you did not do for one of the least of these, you did not do for me.” Mt 25:45]

[“Duterte’s ‘war on drugs’ is a war on the poor” – Amnesty International]

ARE WE STILL BEING PUNISHED?

Randy David in his Inquirer’s column unveiled the “sinfulness” of our nation.

“The damage that [Duterte’s] presidency did to the country’s legal and political institutions is incalculable. It exposed the opportunism and servility of the political class. It showed the susceptibility of the legal system to manipulation and use as a weapon against the president’s political enemies. It uncovered the brittleness of the mass media and the business community in the face of presidential intimidation. It revealed the limits of the judiciary as a check to the abuse of presidential prerogative.”

David gave an inkling of the answer to the question: Are we still being punished?

“I hesitate to use the past tense in describing these forms of institutional damage. For we cannot be certain that the political climate that catapulted Duterte to the presidency in 2016 has passed. The Duterte brand lingers in the air and remains popular – if surveys are to be believed.”

MOMENT OF TRUTH

Question: Are we still being punished? The answer to such a question will turn out to be as easy as ABC – if former president Duterte returns to politics.

Patricia Evangelista asserts, “The thousands who died were killed with the permission of my people.”

Would you offer yours all over again?


Head collage photos courtesy of iStock, it is writtendotcom, & The Manila Times

Video clips courtesy of YouTube

Tuesday, 21 November 2023

BETRAYAL AT THE BURIED X: A TALE OF TWO TEAMS


 

“VP Sara Duterte says she has no ambition to run for president in 2028” (Inquirer)

“'Impeach Sara’ buzz swirls in House; leaders douse rumors” (Philstar)

Is the impeachment buzz the straw that breaks the camel’s back for Sara’s presidential ambition?

Right after the UniTeam landslide win, VP Sara seemed to be a shoo-in as a presidential candidate in the 2028 election. Looking back, in the thick of the 2022 presidential election campaign, I exchanged thought-provoking views with an FB friend who was then standing up for Sara.

The rundown of our interesting discussion I wrote in my ATABAY article Letter To Inday Sara Supporter Who Is Also My Friend which I repost some excerpts below:


Hi! I would like to pick up where we left off in our brief chat recently. Looking back and summing up, we put then all our cards on the table: you’re a pro-Sara; me, a pro-Leni, and we’re both whole-hearted and solid in our respective positions. We have agreed to disagree and despite our differences in our opinions, we gave our word to each other to remain as friends.

That was a few days ago. Today, let me go on by posing this question: Don’t you know that we can find a common ground that will bring us together to agree? Intriguing? You bet it is.

Our common ground: We vote for our leaders to pursue the common good -- love of PH. So, we agree: I vote for Leni for President; you vote for Sara for VP. No conflict.

Now, here comes an intriguing insight. After I vote for Leni and hope she’ll win, my voter’s task ends. Yours just begin: after you vote for Sara and hope she’ll win; further, you dream she will become a president in 2028. For such a dream to come true, she must first jump over the following three hurdles:

Hurdle 1. She must win the 2022 VP race.

Hurdle 2. She must perform with flying colors during her VP term.

Hurdle 3. She must be awarded the leadership succession presidential “baton” by her president.

Let’s look over each hurdle.

Hurdle 1. [She did win.]

Hurdle 2. [Lots of stumbling blocks: “UniTeam disunity,“ “tambaloslos,” CIF, impeachment, and maybe more]

Hurdle 3. If VP Sara [leaps over Hurdle 2 getting past the stumbling blocks], and eventually performs with flying colors… do you think [PBBM] would give Sara the leadership succession presidential “baton” she deserves without hesitation?

Vital factor: Bongbong is running under the umbrella of multiple parties with a throng of vested interests. Aiming now for the 2028 presidency is a horde of younger and ambitious breed of second-generation leaders emerging from a band of dynastic political clans embedded in Bongbong’s team.


Readers, what’s going on in Hurdle 2? In answering this provocative question, let’s get a bit creative. Helen Benedict, a Columbia University journalism professor and author says, “I believe [fiction] could get me nearer to the truth… It is the substance of what happens to people not just on the outside, but within…”

I took a crack at tapping “fiction” in showcasing the essence of Benedict’s assertion in my past ATABAY article The Maze of Political Ambition: Flash Fiction Lessons. I prompted ChatGPT to dig up a popular fiction story on the web about treasure hunters and hit upon the place where the fabled treasure was buried.

ChatGPT rolled out the following fiction, (flash fiction to be exact which it had claimed as its original work when I asked it to cite its source) entitled Betrayal at the Buried X which I adapt below:

As the sun sinks below the horizon [Folks, it’s show, er, circus time], casting an eerie glow over the desolate [political] landscape, a handful of treasure hunters [presidential wannabees] stands in a circle around the fabled X [presidential throne]. Exhaustion [due to double-dealing and horse trading] lines their faces, a testament to the long and arduous hunt [party flip-flopping] that brings them to this moment.

The air crackles with anticipation [Survey: Sara tops to succeed Marcos] but also with an undercurrent of suspicion [Impeachment talk: “I don’t know. I’m not aware”] Each hunter’s eyes dart suspiciously at the others [“Bantayan ninyo ang military”], wondering who will make the first move, who will betray the unspoken code of camaraderie ["Huwag na sana niyang idamay ang AFP at PNP"].

The clues and pointers bring them here, promising unimaginable wealth and glory [Imagine spending P4.5 billion CIF in a year]. But now, greed gnaws at their hearts [Imagine spending P125 million in 11 days], and the dark side of their nature emerges. They know that only one can claim the treasure. [“Gusto mo mag-Presidente?”]

A treacherous tension hangs in the air as they weigh their options. Who can they trust? Loyalties waver [Headline: Duterte’s daughter quits party, decries ‘political powerplay’] and alliances form and dissolve within the span of a heartbeat [Headline: More solons abandoned Duterte’s PDP-Laban]

In this twisted game of deceit, the plot takes a sinister turn. One by one, the hunters reveal their true colors [Lawmaker resigns from PDP-Laban], their masks slipping away like shadows in the fading light [“Kung umalis kayong lahat, okay lang.”] Each move is calculated, designed to eliminate the competition and secure the coveted treasure [Headline: Imee Marcos to back Rodrigo Duterte]

Backstabbing and double-crossing become the norm as promises are broken and alliances shattered [Headline: Demoted again: House removes Arroyo from deputy speaker position] Desperation fuels their actions [“the most rotten institution”], blurring the lines between friend and foe [“The one who uttered that word is our chairman”].

In the end, as darkness swallows the landscape, only one figure [will stand] triumphant. The treasure [will be] finally claimed but at a heavy cost. The echoes of betrayal reverberate in the silence, a chilling reminder of the treacherous nature that lurks within even the most outwardly innocent souls.

And so, as the stars twinkle above, casting a cold gaze upon the scene, the treacherous tone of this dark tale will linger, a warning to those who will dare to tread the treacherous path of ambition and greed.

As the saying goes, “That’s the way the cookie, er, the UniTeam crumbles”.




Content put together in collaboration with Microsoft Bing AI-powered co-pilot

Head collage photos courtesy of Inquirer, YouTube, & ABS-CBN News

Video clips courtesy of YouTube



Saturday, 18 November 2023

LEILA DE LIMA FREE: AT LAST PH WAKES UP FROM A BAD DREAM


 

Free at last. After 6 years, 8 months, 21 days. And this is my 2,454th day…”

Words above are Leila de Lima's opening line in her statement after her recent release from detention. Before I present the full transcript of her statement, let me share some excerpts of my past ATABAY article A Bad Dream For The Nation which I feel will shed light on the fitting context of this momentous milestone.

“In her small cell, [Senator Leila de Lima] has a single bed, a stand fan, a few pieces of monobloc chairs, 5 small plastic boxes for her clothes, a full-length mirror, a 5-layer bookshelf, a tiny foldable side table, a desk filled with documents and books, hardly giving her space to move, and a few more boxes of books.

“She has a microwave oven, too – so far the only electronic appliance she’s allowed. She had requested that her staff bring her home-cooked food daily for safety reasons.

“The senator has a small ice chest, which her staff fills with store-bought ice daily.

“In a tiny bathroom, a toilet bowl, a pail of water, and a dipper are the only notable fixtures.

“She usually starts her day between 5 and 5:30 am by praying and reading the Gospel. De Lima said she has now become a ‘serious’ Bible reader.”

(De Lima: One Year Of Living And Surviving In Jail, Rappler)

I could only wonder if Senator de Lima’s daily early morning quiet time of reflection has ever stirred up her memories of the traumatic events in the past that led to her present detention.

“De Lima, you are finished. Tapos ka na.”

Spine-chilling words above by President Rodrigo Roa Duterte (PRRD) -- the crux of her detention -- thundered during a midnight news conference in Davao City that ended in the wee hours of the morning. Getting on PRRD’s nerves, De Lima, as chair of the Commission on Human Rights, had spearheaded the investigation of summary executions carried out by death squads in Davao where, for more than two decades, PRRD held dominion as a mayor.

Later, as chair of the Senate Committee on Justice and Human Rights, she set off a public inquiry into PRRD’s “war on drugs” -- a bloody extrajudicial campaign that has claimed thousands of lives.


“Senator de Lima takes the time to feed her new buddies – stray cats that have become her family. Her staff even brings fish for her cats, together with the senator’s daily meals.

“After attending to her cats, she starts cleaning her detention cell, including the small court outside.

“Yan na rin ang exercise ko rito. (That also serves as my exercise here).”

“After this, she resumes reading newspapers, work documents, and novels.

“She takes her siesta between 11 and 11:30 am, before again returning to reading. By 1 pm, she takes her lunch.

“She then spends the next few hours meeting with her staff as she tries to continue fulfilling her mandate. Around 3 to 5 pm, she spends time with visitors, if there are any, in the holding room.

“By 5 pm, when visitors are made to leave, she’s back to having only stray cats as companions. It is the time when reality hits her most.”

(De Lima, Rappler)

“She looks nice… Fighter talaga.”

PRRD’s typical words for the antagonist could either be complimenting her guts as a woman compared to her colleagues who have real balls but are spineless, or they’re words that could be titillating for her alleged [deepfake] sex videos.

Looking back, Justice Secretary Vitaliano Aguirre II offered at that time in showing at the House of Representatives panel hearing Senator de Lima’s alleged sex videos. Women’s groups and female lawmakers blocked the attempts to have the video shown.

“It is not me, as far as I’m concerned… It is a violation. A gross violation of my rights and my dignity as a woman.” Senator de Lima disavowed and raised objections then.

Though the sex videos were not shown in the hearing, the House of Representatives panel feasted on the salacious grilling of the witnesses with lurid questions raised and suggestive comments made for the sexually arousing pleasure of the whole panel crowd.

“Nagtampisaw ba kayong dalawa sa init ng inyong katawan?”

“Pinagsamantalahan mo ba ang maselan na babae?”

 “Napakahilig mo namang magsalat.”

“[Senator de Lima] eats her no-rice dinner by 8 pm.

“The senator said she misses the time when she could cook and go to the market again. At one point during her first year in the Senate, she sent her specialty laing to reporters.

“‘I also miss going to Our Lady of Manaoag. I go there thrice a month. I miss driving because it relaxes me, also practical shooting, watching movies, listening to music, and dancing,’ De Lima said.

“But for now, De Lima has no choice but to go on missing her life outside. She herself has learned to live with her current fate.

“And with the coming of her second year in jail, she said she only has a hope to cling to.

“’It’s just a hope. Realistically, it seems quite remote. Nothing less than a miracle would free me.’”

(De Lima, Rappler)

            That was five years ago. Today, after 2,454 days of living and surviving in jail, the seemingly quite remote miracle has happened. Leila de Lima is free at last. Here’s the full transcript of her statement.


Though it took too long, I never lost faith that my inevitable freedom will come. Alam ninyong lahat kung gaano katagal tayo naghintay at nagtiis, nang may pananalig sa katotohanan, at ang tutuong hustisya ay magtatagumpay.

But the counting of the years, the months, days, hours, minutes, seconds, the milestones in my own life, in my family’s life, and our nation’s history that I've missed by being unjustly detained, cannot be counted. None of those can fully express how much and how long I have longed to be able to say the words, finally, “The truth will set me free.” Yes, it’s always the truth, it’s always for the truth, and that’s why I’m now set free.

Wala segurong sapat na salita ang lubos na makapaglarawan sa damdamin ng isang inosenting inapi. Sa kabila ng pighati at paghihirap na dulot ng pagbaluktot sa mismong batas at sa prosesong ipinaglalaban, ay patuloy na nananalig, nanampalataya, at umaasa, na darating din ang panahon, na mananaig ang katotohanan at tunay na katarungan.

Every moment was a test, and every single second was a fight to rise above the sorrow, the fears, the uncertainties of the future, and even, to be honest, the temptation to be overcome by hate and vindictive thoughts. There was always that temptation.

Lahat po iyon ay nilabanan ko. Hindi ko isusuko ang aking pagkatao at pagiging tao. They may have taken years in my life, but they will never take my humanity.

Ang mundo ay puno ng mga taong baluktot ang kaluluwa at makasarili, sa harap ng pagdurusa ng taong bayan. I will never be one of them.

Every second, every minute, every hour, every day, every month, and every year, of the last 2,454 days, was a struggle. But the one thing I can honestly say is that I never allowed myself to even entertain any regret. No regret.

Yes, I wish things turned out differently, but these are things that are beyond my control. But for the things that were, what I did, how I reacted, and my reasons for fighting for those who were victimized and cannot speak for themselves, I have no regret.

As I appear before you today, 6 years, 8 months, 21 days, after I peaceably surrendered myself to the authorities, it is one of my greatest achievements in my career and in my life to say that not only did I survive, all these years of persecution and unjust detention, I came out stronger than ever, with an even stronger commitment to truth, justice, human rights, democracy, and the rule of law.

These are not just words to me. These have been my lifeline. These have been my life before, during, and after my unjust detention started.

Kayo po ang aking ipinaglaban. Kaya maraming salamat dahil ako rin ang inyong ipinaglaban. Marami maraming salamat po sa mga panalangin ninyo, at sa walang kapagurang pananalig ninyo sa katotohanan. Dios mabalos. Mabuhay ang Sambayanang Pilipino at ang Pilipinas.


Head photo courtesy of France 24

Video clips courtesy of YouTube

FOX SILIC, GYM BAGS, AND THE FATAL COST OF SARA DUTERTE'S EARLY PRESIDENTIAL BID

  “Fox silic? Wala, no. I cannot comment on that.” When Vice President Sara Duterte muttered those baffling words to reporters, she wasn’t j...