“The dirty little secret of… surveys is – they are largely junk science
placing marketing objectives of telling and selling a good story, above the
practical and ethical objective of telling the truth… Often statistical methods
are misused corrupting survey results while providing an air of scientific
legitimacy…” (Excerpted from the article “Surveys and Dirty Little Secret;
Hidden Distortion, Bias – Illusion of Scientific Validity: Business Beware”)
SURVEY DISCREPANCY
SWS Survey 1. Fourth
Quarter 2021: 75% of Filipinos said they were satisfied with PRRD’s
performance.
SWS Survey 2. Second
Quarter 2021 SWS Survey: 77% of Filipinos feel poor including borderline poor.
SWS Survey 3. Second
Quarter 2020 SWS Survey: 83% of Filipinos said their quality of life has
worsened in the last 12 months.
At a glance, we can figure out 1 contradicts 2 &
3. This telling discrepancy happened before.
Headline 1: Women
in the Philippines Have Had Enough of PRRD’s Macho’ Leadership
“Since taking office in June 2016, the 73-year old
leader has ordered soldiers to shoot female rebels in the vagina, made
inappropriate comments about his female Vice President’s legs, joked about
raping Miss Universe, and equated having a second wife to keeping a ‘spare
tire’ in the trunk of a car.”
Headline 2: Gabriela
blames Duterte’s “misogyny” for “culture of rape” in PNP.
“[A] Manila police officer allegedly raped the
15-year-old daughter of a drug suspect to clear her father from drug
allegations.”
Palace: PRRD’s “very good” rating shows “unshakable
trust.”
“PRRD was rated ‘excellent’ in… promoting women’s
rights…”
GLOBAL INDEXES
Let’s put in far-reaching global indexes:
1. Transparency International’s 2021 Corruption
Perception Index. PH scored 33 out of 100, the same as the average score of
Sub-Saharan Africa, and below the world average of 44. Exhibit A. Pharmally
scandal. Exhibit B. Malampaya deal
2. World Justice Project’s Rule of Law, PH scored 0.46
(1 is best), ranked 102nd out of 139 countries, 13th out of 15 in
the region.
3. Lowy Institute’s Asia Power Index. PH ranked 16th
out of 26 countries, the lowest comprehensive power among the ASEAN-5.
PUNDITS’ VIEWS
Let’s tag on views of Philstar columnist Alex Magno:
“The nation was plunged into its deepest recession in
2020… we had to borrow substantial amounts to cover our spending needs, raising
our debt stock in the process. Our economic recovery has been in fits and starts…Things
have been difficult for our people for the last two years. Unemployment and
poverty rates spiked…”
“Duterte has been caricatured in the international
press as some sort of mass murderer for the casualties incurred in the course
of the war on drugs. A case was brought against him at the International
Criminal Court.”
“The President’s handling of the complicated situation
in the South China Sea… paint him a Beijing puppet unwilling to defend what we
think is our territory.”
The Manila Times columnist Lito Monico C. Lorenzana’s banner
speaks volumes:
“The Unravelling of the Duterte Legacy – Corruption.”
His teasing chaser on the Pharmally scandal gave away
the whole shebang and left nothing to our imagination.
“[I]t seems obvious who the capo di tutti capi is –
the Godfather of them all. But didn’t we know this from the start?”
GLOBAL VIEWS
The global views have been piercing like a two-edged
sword as indicated by Time Magazine’s banner flashed all over the world when
PRRD’s was elected as President: “Why Did the Philippines Just Elect a Guy Who
Jokes About Rape as Its President?”
The New York Times bannered PRRD’s Most Contentious Quotations ranging from “Hitler massacred three million Jews. Now, there are three million drug addicts. I’d be happy to slaughter them” to “Son of a whore. I will curse you (President Obama) in the forum.”
DISSERVICE TO FILIPINOS
Anyone reading all of the above PRRD’s gross deficits
(from minor GMRC to major performance-based aspects of his presidency) and to
learn that SWS has attributed the opinions of 1,440 survey respondents (for
being satisfied with PRRD’s performance) to the overall opinions of 75% of all
Filipinos across the country could not help himself or herself to think that
the extrapolated equivalence is tantamount to downgrading the Filipino
intelligence and diminishing their self-respect, let alone, doing a great
disservice to Filipino stature in the eyes of the world.
The SWS spokesperson ascribed PRRD’s ratings to diligence
and decisiveness – given basics to the sum total of leadership -- while pundits
and operatives exclaiming PRRD’s defying feat as “Phenomenal” or “Amazing” is sycophantic. Predictably, SWS would never
explain the root of the contradiction -- the so-called “survey’s dirty little
secret.”
FEAR FACTOR
“Interviews are conducted face-to-face. The
respondent’s name and address are known to the interviewer. The interviewer’s
true purpose may be suspect to the respondent,” one pundit explained.
In view of such reality, most Filipinos today, due to
PRRD’S culture of fear spawned by his brutal war on drugs, would be thinking
twice in participating in surveys – a “bystander apathy” phenomenon. Not only
fearful, but they are also “demotivated and lacking enthusiasm… just don’t care
enough…they don’t care that they don’t care” Leon F. Seltzer Ph.D. of
Psychology Today said on such human behavior. The culprit in the latest two
successive US presidential election poll failures is “nonresponse bias”
generated by an “unrepresentative sample” – a flawed survey condition – the
same flaw our local election surveys have languished.
The net effect: PRRD’s high rating implies he is
feared, not endeared. That fits PRRD’s game plan like a glove. The somber
exchange between PRRD and Maria Ressa during a particular interview vouched for
it.
Maria Ressa (MR): Violence
and you say this you know violence is okay. Is it necessary to lead?
PRRD: Violence
is my strength…until the last dragon is killed, this campaign will continue to
the very last day of my term.
MR: Is it
important that people be afraid of you?
PRRD: Fear…There
must be fear.
LAST DAYS: WANING OF POWER AND FEAR
Being feared and not endeared -- explains PRRD’s Go
and Bato endorsement flops. Only when one truly loves, trusts and believes PRRD
will he or she says “yes” to anyone, I repeat, to anyone, that PRRD endorses
for the presidency. Hardly ever would one bow to such endorsement out of fear,
hence the endorsement flops. The same truism brings into play in his bullying
flounder of Marcos Jr. as a “cocaine user.”
No doubt, as president, PRRD has the political power –
the capacity to coerce others, overtly or covertly, to do his will. But, such
power resides in his position, not in his person, and is not related to innate goodness
and wisdom. When PRRD starts leaving his position, his power (and the
accompanying fear) would start to wane, hence, the reason for the gradual downward
trend of his rating.
Driving home the essence of this article, let me
conclude with an ironic cartoon. One pollster, looking at his computer screen,
says to one officemate looking over his shoulder
“This is interesting. 70% of the respondents to our survey said they don’t respond to surveys.”
No comments:
Post a Comment