“Now I know why last year’s results in my vote-rich
Cavite home province defied historical data since I first ran for the Senate in
2001.
“Save for ‘class-act’ Noli de Castro, who beat me in
that midterm poll by 30,000 votes, I was consistently my province mates’ top
choice in all succeeding elections in which I participated.
“That includes the 2004 presidential election in which
I beat powerful incumbent Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo and the very popular Fernando
Poe Jr. Not to forget my 2007 and 2016 senatorial wins.
“Last year I got only a measly 91,000 out of 2.3
million votes.”
The above statement was made recently by Panfilo
Lacson, a veteran senator, and former presidential candidate expressing his
dismay over the rigged May 9, 2022 election in a column by Jarius Bondoc in
Philstar.
Just when the Comelec came up short in its explanation,
the possibility of the rigged election – based on Brig Gen Eliseo Rio’s position
paper “A Preponderance Of Evidence Shows That The May 09, 2022 Election Was
Rigged”-- has pumped up and given free rein to people’s imagination, forming
now-I-know-why images in their minds as Lacson showcased. We couldn’t find fault
with people who can’t help conjuring up now-I-know-why pictures like this one
below:
WHY BONGBONG SNUBBED PRESIDENTIAL DEBATE
Now I know why presidential candidate Marcos Jr. snubbed
the presidential debate during the campaign season. Looking back, Comelec’s
presidential debate was organized “in the spirit of civility and dialogue for
the continuing education of the electorate.” It was “the venue where the
presidential candidates can reach out to as many citizens at the same time and
share the same forum to explain what they stand for and why they deserve to be
elected president for the next six years.”
The widely held sneaking suspicion then for his snub –
he was scared to be found out as an “emperor with no clothes”. The more
profound one then – he didn’t care about the people.
But, with the rigged election mess turning up lately, the real reason may be a no-brainer -- it was his in-your-face “what’s the use” stance – a subtle clue of the looming large “game over” by then on its way.
Mindful of the timidity of most mainstream media, burying
their heads in the sand on this controversy, President Bongbong Marcos (PBBM)
may now be holding assuredly the unwavering view that the rigged election claim
is neither here nor there as laid out by the following pundits.
Philstar’s Ana Marie Pamintuan’s thoughts in her
column “Apathetic” may be tranquilizing to PBBM:
“The biggest challenge is making people care [about
the rigged election mess] … Filipinos bend with the wind and can be patient to
a fault. It would take over a decade before the assassination of Ninoy Aquino
would end the [people’s] apathy…”
By the same token, Vergel O. Santos in his Rappler
article “Where our miseries began”, wrote:
“As for the beneficiaries themselves of election
riggings, they seem able, as a rule, to somehow keep their hands off the stink
or otherwise wash it well off. And since election protests take too long to
resolve, the truly elected end up with hollow victories, because the terms of
the positions finally judged rightfully theirs have by then all but expired.”
As a former lecturer, that reminds me of this dry and
trite expression in the classroom: “Turn in your papers; time is up.”
Come what may, in the course of PBBM’s whole six-year
term when such election protest is being resolved in the court, people’s conjuring
up of now-I-know-why images in their minds, will keep going, even impacting the
talking points of pundits in the opinion pages like this one below:
WHY PBBM TURNED THE TABLES ON FPRRD
Now I know why PBBM turned the tables on Former
President Rodrigo Roa Duterte (FPRRD) along with his China-appeasing policy. Not
only was the sudden turnaround – aligning with the USA -- clashes with FPRRD,
it flies too in the face of the themes of “unity” and “continuity” of his political
party with FPRRD’s daughter VP Sara. PBBM has welcomed instead with open arms
the USA.
Many pundits were caught flatfooted by such a
180-degree about-face in foreign policy and theories abound for such an unexpected
move.
Here is the now-I-know-why take on such a move -- deep-rooted
in the rigged election claim’s what-if worst scenario: What if a bunch of
techie whistleblowers suddenly enters into the picture, exposes the mechanism of
the rigged election mess, escalates the situation, gets it out of control, and
ultimately turns the public into a towering rage?
The key to the answer is embedded in history and fleshed
out in the following excerpts from the book “Impossible Dream: The Marcoses, The
Aquinos, and the Unfinished Revolution” by Sandra Burton:
“After conferring with [U.S. President Ronald Reagan],
[Senator Paul] Laxalt called [President Ferdinand Marcos Sr.] back. By now [Day
4, People Power Revolution, February 25, 1986], it was 5:30 in the morning in
Manila. The senator told him that power-sharing would be impractical and
undignified. He repeated the president’s invitation to the Marcoses to move to
the U.S. His considerable reserves of determination and defiance now
practically depleted, Marcos [Sr.] turned to Laxalt for advice. What should he
do? he asked. Laxalt put it to him straight. ‘I think you should cut and cut
cleanly. I think the time has come.’
“The silence at the other end of the phone was so
pronounced, so profound that Laxalt finally had to ask if Marcos [Sr.] was
still there. He was, but his persona had changed. He had no brash comeback with
which to respond to Laxalt’s recommendation. No counterproposal. For once, he
was honest in showing his emotions. ‘I am so very, very, disappointed,’ [Marcos
Sr.] said.”
US CALLED THE SHOTS
Beyond the shadow of a doubt, that extraordinary and
emotional phone conversation turned out to be the now-or-never moment of the
People Power Revolution which let the cat out of the bag – the U.S. -- being
then the most powerful nation in the world -- called the historic shots.
Whether such reality is still true or not today, no
doubt, Marcos Jr. has not erased from his memory his father’s indelible once-in-a-lifetime
high-stake taste of geopolitical power play and may have decided to align
himself with the US in case of a similar scenario.
Abounding now-I-know-why images in people’s minds are
just around the corner and could come on the scene at any moment like, for
instance, this one:
Now I know why there was a viral letter circulating on
the internet in the thick of the May 9, 2022 election about a Chinese IT hired
to do a man-in-the-middle attack to hack the Transparency Server, hence the 3x
faster transmission of the election results during the first hour after voting ended, and whose
source could not be traced.
Or, this:
Now I know why there was a viral post in the thick of the
May 9, 2022 election about a mother who grimly told about his military son, clued
in on a covert election rigging, who warned her not to get involved with the election
issue.
Or this from Ret Col Leonardo Odoño as shared by his knowledgeable
friend in Philstar Jarius Bondoc column:
Now I know why Smartmatic and the incoming First Lady celebrated
less than two hours from the close of voting on May 9, 2022.
Or as plain as this:
Now I know why I’ve never felt the jubilation in the
air of this so-called 31-million voting multitude.
Only when the doubt about the rigged election is cleaned up, will the episodes of conjuring up now-I-know-why images in people’s minds eventually dissipate.
The International Foundation For Electoral Systems
Head photo courtesy of depositphotosdotcom
Video clips courtesy of YouTube
No comments:
Post a Comment