WHY DEMOCRACY DIES IN DARKNESS: A WARNING FROM AMERICA'S LITTLE BROTHER

 

“If we don’t hold them accountable, who will?”

Ben Bradlee (played by Tom Hanks in the 2017 film The Post), the fearless editor of The Washington Post, raises this question in the dimly lit conference room of the newspaper’s headquarters.

Shadows flicker against the stern faces of the executives, editors, and legal advisors gathered for a momentous decision -- one that will define their careers and could strip them of their freedom.

“The only way to assert the right to publish is to publish.”

Katharine Graham (played by Meryl Streep) responds, her unwavering resolve masked by a composed exterior. Once an unlikely publisher, thrust into her role by tragedy, she now stands at the eye of a storm. Her greatest test lies before her: the choice to publish the explosive Pentagon Papers.

“You could go to prison; you could lose the paper. You could lose everything.”

Arthur Parsons (played by Bradley Whitford) warns. Around them, board members and lawyers urge restraint, their voices layered with caution and fear of the inevitable backlash.

In the larger context, the Nixon administration looms ominously, its shadow extending over the press. This is no mere battle for survival – it is a confrontation with history itself.

“This is no longer my father’s company, it’s no longer my husband’s company. It’s mine. And anyone who thinks otherwise probably doesn’t belong on my board.”

Graham declares, marking her transformation from a reluctant leader to a resolute publisher who stands firm on her principles.

“We’ve got to make this decision ourselves, Katharine. 

Bradlee stresses.

“I’m not asking for your permission, Ben. I’m asking for your advice.” 

Graham replies.

The gravity of their choice saturates the air, as Graham, strengthened by Bradlee’s words, rises to meet the demands of journalistic duty. In her silence, the room holds its breath; with her resolve, the future of the free press hangs in the balance.

“The press was to serve the governed, not the governor.”

Bradlee’s words, quoting Supreme Court Justice Hugo Black, crystallize the First Amendment’s purpose and the moral imperative driving them forward.

The scene builds to Graham’s decisive moment, where she signals the go-ahead to publish -- a triumph for press freedom, underscored by her personal growth as she assumes her role as a true leader in media.

That was over fifty years ago. Today, The Washington Post, with its tagline Democracy Dies in Darkness seems unrecognizable compared to Graham’s heyday.

As I write this, three members of its editorial board have resigned and more than 250,000 readers have canceled their subscriptions. The issue? The Post will not endorse a presidential candidate in this year’s election. The editorial board had reportedly drafted an endorsement of Vice President Kamala Harris before billionaire publisher Jeff Bezos dismissed it.

“[The non-endorsement] is an effort by Jeff Bezos to curry favor with Donald Trump in anticipation of his possible victory,” says Robert Kagan, a columnist and opinion editor-at-large who had been with the paper for 25 years -- publicly resigned as a direct result of the non-endorsement.

“This is cowardice, a moment of darkness that will leave democracy as a casualty,” former Executive Director Marty Baron stated to Vanity Fair.

A typical reader’s comment on the issue hits close to the truth:

“Let’s be clear. The fundamental problem is billionaires owning the major news outlet. When their personal wealth, power, and self-aggrandizement are threatened, the response is the same. It’s not really a different response than most people would have when threatened.”

CNN analyst Allison Morrow echoes the threat, writing:

“If reelected, Donald Trump has made it clear that he plans to exact revenge on the people and institutions he perceives as a threat. His ‘enemies’ list seems to be constantly growing as the election nears, and includes Democratic politicians, the media, lawyers and political donors…”

CNN reports, Big Tech CEOs are calling Trump, seeking to rekindle their relationship with the former president ahead of Election Day.

The current situation in U.S. media, demonstrated by the Jeff Bezos affair, parallels a similar struggle in the Philippines, as I discussed in my April 25, 2023, ATABAY article Is Philippines Turning into Informational Autocracy? Here’s an excerpt:

><><

Let’s look at [the Philippine’s] present informational ecosystem to get an inkling. The Manila Times’ Rigoberto Tiglao’s column Marcos’ advantage: An acquiescent press speaks volumes and spot on:

“The [Philippine] Star... can’t offend the Palace, and would be quick to fire any columnist creating trouble for the First Couple… 

"[T]he Philippine Daily Inquirer [PDI] has lost its belligerence... lost a lot when the Duterte administration took away from them the government-owned Mile-Long Commercial Center... likely etched into their heads the lesson that it certainly isn’t financially rewarding to go against a government… Marcos’ cousin, Philip Romualdez, is the husband of Alexandra Prieto, the owning clan’s main representative in running the newspaper.

"Romualdez also owns the tabloid People’s Tonight… 

"Philip’s brother, House Speaker Martin Romualdez, owns the Manila Standard…

"The Manila Bulletin has always very strictly supported whoever is in power…

"The Manila Times... owned by Dante A. Ang [former President GMA’s senior publicist, FPRRD's appointed Special Envoy for International Public Relations, and now PBBM’s Chairman of the Commission on Filipinos Overseas]... 

"Daily Tribune... is said to be close to [FPRRD]... among its columnists are former Duterte chief legal counsel Salvador Panelo [he is now a Manila Times columnist] and presidential special assistant Christopher Lawrence 'Bong' Go..."

Tiglao observes, "I don’t think there’s ever been such a tight hold over the media by an administration.”

Cartoon by Angelo Lopez of Cartoon Movement

><><

Oddly enough, the warning for America doesn’t come from within its border but from its little brother, the Philippines. Nobel laureate Maria Ressa, who has courageously stood against disinformation and governmental repression in the Philippines, issues a sobering reminder that democracy is at stake in the U.S. election.

Her words resonate far beyond the Philippines, striking a universal chord in any society where the foundation of truth, trust, and law are tested.

“If you have no facts, you can’t have truth. Without truth, you can’t have trust. Without these three, we have no shared reality, no rule of law. We have no democracy. If we lack integrity, there is no integrity in our elections.”

Ressa’s warning speaks not only to the fragility of democratic institutions but also to the responsibilities borne by the press, fact-checkers, and even social media platforms, whose influence now shapes public opinion on an unprecedented scale.

It underscores a broader struggle going beyond political affiliation, reaching into the core values of any democratic society: transparency, accountability, and an informed citizenry.

In an age when powerful forces – from billionaires to governments– can manipulate narratives, the press has a higher calling to uphold the truth. The Washington Post’s iconic tagline, Democracy Dies in Darkness, once an emblem of resilience, now serves as a cautionary reminder of what can happen when the lights begin to dim when economic interests and political pressures erode the integrity of our newsrooms.

The choice to heed Ressa’s warning is ours. Will we demand a press that serves the people, not power? Will we support journalism that stands as a pillar of democracy? Or will we sit back as truth becomes a casualty in the war of influence?

In essence, democracy doesn’t die in a single, decisive moment. It fades, quietly, in increments – when facts are contested, when voices are silenced, and when vigilance gives way to apathy.

And if America, like so many others, doesn’t heed this call to defend the integrity of its institutions, it might find itself mourning the loss of a democracy that vanished in the dark.

Content and editing put together in collaboration with ChatGPT

Head collage photos courtesy of Wikipedia & Spreadshirt

Still photos courtesy of Graham Media Group, Redbubble, Wallpaper Cave, grupobcc.com, Manila Times cartoon, & White House Historical Association

HARRIS VS. TRUMP: HOW IMMIGRATION COULD RESHAPE AMERICA

 

As I watched Ed’s house’s backyard transform from a vacant space into a patio with beautiful twin gazebos, it stirred memories of my construction days from years back. Each day, the patio took shape a little more, and as a civil engineer, I couldn’t help but feel a sense of nostalgia.

Each plank laid seemed to echo the countless hours I’d spent then on various job sites, meticulously ensuring every detail was up to standard. Watching the backyard evolve was more than a simple renovation; it was a canvas where art and engineering met, reminding me of the beauty inherent in the work engineers do.

But what truly caught my attention was the team behind the works. They appeared to be immigrants, possibly from Mexico – working under the sun, bringing Ed’s vision to life with skills honed over the years, perhaps miles away from the U.S.

Ed's backyard transforms into a patio with twin gazebos

America has long been built by hands like these – hands that cross borders, leaving behind families and familiar landscapes to find opportunity and stability in the land of the free and the home of the brave. These workers, and millions like them, form an essential part of the U.S. economy. Yet as the country heads into one of its most critical elections in recent memory, the immigrants’ futures hang in the balance.

Immigration is more than a political talking point; it’s a matter that impacts real lives, communities, and the American identity itself.

With that in mind, I’m excited to share with you a special conversation on today’s Politik Talk. Join us as we dig deep into the immigration policies of the 2024 candidates and explore what a Harris or Trump presidency could mean for the future of U.S. immigration. Let’s shed light on the issue, so voters can make an informed choice this November.

ME: Welcome to our live TV Talk Show Politik Talk! Today we have a special guest, a geopolitical expert, who will simplify a complex immigration issue in this upcoming election and hopefully illuminate everyone to make a wise decision on who to vote for this coming November to determine the next U.S. president. Please help me welcome, our special guest, Mr. AI!

MR AI: Thank you for having me. I’m looking forward to answering the questions you wanted to know but were afraid to ask, as the title of an old bestseller goes, amid this election season, where immigration can feel like a daunting and divisive topic.

ME: Immigration is a hot topic, and everyone seems to have an opinion. Let’s start with a big-picture question: Why has immigration become such a critical issue in this election?

MR AI: Great question! Immigration is on everyone’s radar this election because about 11% of the U.S. population, or 37.5 million people, are directly impacted by immigration policies. This issue touches many Americans, whether through family ties, local economies, or labor markets.

As you know, immigration has ripple effects on the economy, healthcare, social services, and even national security. It’s become a defining issue because voters want clarity on where the candidates stand – whether they favor a more open and inclusive approach or a stricter, security-first approach.

ME: That’s a huge portion of the population affected! Now let’s break this down for our viewers. Can you classify the main groups of people affected by U.S. immigration policies and what their primary concerns are?

MR AI: Absolutely. Let’s break it down into groups:

1. Undocumented Immigrants. They make up around 10.5 million people and worry about deportation, access to public services, and pathways to citizenship.

2. DREAMers (Development, Relief, and Education for Alien Minors) and DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals) Recipients. Roughly 1.2 million people are eligible for DACA with legal protections and a stable path to permanent residency.

3. Workers with Temporary Visas. About 2 million people in sectors like tech and agriculture rely on visa renewals and job security while hoping for pathways to permanent residency.

4. Asylum Seekers and Refugees. Around 3 million people fleeing hardship, are concerned with fair asylum hearings and access to social services.

5. Family-Based Immigrants. Some 5 million waiting for family-sponsored visas face long processing times and visa backlogs.

6. Permanent Residents. Around 13.9 million legal residents with green cards may want citizenship but worry about deportation risks for certain offenses.

7. High-Skilled Immigrants in STEM (Science, Technology, Engineering, & Mathematics) and Business. Approximately 1.5 million people on work visas are navigating visa quotas and long waits for green cards.

8. Temporary Protected Status (TPS) Holders. Roughly 0.4 million people are protected temporarily due to crises in their home countries but lack a secure path to permanent residency.

Each group has unique concerns, but they’re all looking for stability, opportunity, and a clear sense of the future.

ME: That helps paint the picture of how diverse these groups are! So, let’s get to the heart of the matter: What would a Kamala Harris presidency mean for these groups?

MR AI: A Harris administration would likely aim for a balanced approach, emphasizing compassion and integration. Here’s what that might look like:

Pathways to Citizenship. Harris would likely support new pathways to citizenship, especially for DREAMers and undocumented immigrants with long U.S. residency.

Asylum Reforms. Harris has historically favored streamlined asylum processes which would mean faster and fairer hearings for asylum seekers and refugees.

Focus on Labor Needs. Harris could support policies to help temporary visa holders and high-skilled workers secure long-term opportunities in the U.S., especially in high-demand sectors.

Social and Legal Protections. We could see increased funding for legal aid and social services to help immigrants better integrate into American society, benefiting family-based immigrants and TPS holders.

In essence, Harris would focus on integration and human treatment – addressing both security and compassion in her policies.

ME: That sounds like a gentler approach to immigration. Now, let’s hear about Trump’s stance. How would a Trump presidency impact these groups?

MR AI: Trump’s approach would likely be more restrictive and security-focused. Here’s a snapshot:

Stricter Border Control. Expect an increase in border security measures and a renewed push for physical barriers. This would impact asylum seekers and those trying to enter the U.S. at the southern border.

Reversal of DACA and Other Protections. Trump might limit protection for DACA recipients and TPS holders, increasing deportation risks for undocumented immigrants.

Restrictions on Work Visas. Temporary workers in sectors like tech and agriculture might face tougher visa policies, and high-skilled workers could see reduced H-1B quotas.

Increased Enforcement. Under Trump, immigration enforcement would likely intensify, focusing on deporting undocumented immigrants and enforcing strict visa compliance.

In short, a Trump presidency would focus on limiting new entries and enforcing current laws more stringently, prioritizing national security and border control over integration efforts.

ME: Fascinating contrast! With two very different approaches, it’s no wonder immigration is such a hot topic. Before we wrap up, one final question: In your view, why is it so crucial for American voters to understand the nuances of immigration policy this election?

MR AI: Immigration touches on economics, ethics, and security. It’s about who Americans are as a nation and what it values. This election offers starkly different visions: one focused on openness and integration, the other on security and restriction.

Each approach has far-reaching consequences, not only for immigrants but for the communities they’re a part of. An informed vote is essential because the policies voters choose today will shape the future for millions of people, Americans and immigrants alike.

ME: Well said, Mr. AI. Thank you for breaking down such a complex issue and helping our viewers make sense of it.

Voters, remember, immigration is more than just a policy topic – it’s about the lives, dreams, and futures of millions. Make your vote count this November.

And that’s a wrap on today’s Politik Talk. Thank you again, Mr. AI, for joining us.

MR AI: Thank you! It’s been a pleasure. Here’s to making informed choices.

ME: Thank you all for tuning in. Here’s to achieving the elusive American Dream!

Content and editing put together in collaboration with ChatGPT

Head collage photos courtesy of American Civil Liberties Union & Tufts Now – Tufts University

Still Photos courtesy of Global Refuge, Facebook, & Pinterest

THE STORM INSIDE: EXPOSING THE DARK SIDE OF RELIGIOUS POWER

 

“Do you trust me, Maya?” Damien, the cult leader, asked, his voice coated with a deceptive warmth. His loyal follower knelt at his feet, her head bowed low, and wet strands of hair clinging to her face. Her shoulders quivered – not from the cold, but under the crushing weight of what was about to unfold.

Outside, the storm raged -- a violent tempest battering the walls, as if nature sought to break in and witness the unfolding horror. The wind howled with an almost human wail, while rain beat furiously against the windows. Yet inside, the air was suffocatingly still, heavy with unspoken dread.

“Prove it,” Damien whispered, his hand lightly brushing her cheek, the touch cold and possessive.

Damien sat elevated on a chair that resembled a throne, his presence dominating even in the dim light. The storm outside seemed to bow to his will, its wrath a reflection of the power he wielded within. His eyes gleamed with an unsettling intensity, a perfect mix of charisma and menace, as he gazed at the woman kneeling before him.

“You are my most faithful, Maya,” he murmured, his voice both a command and a caress. “You’ve given me everything -- your loyalty, your trust. Now, could you give me more? Prove your devotion is limitless.”

You're not a victim for sharing your story

His touch lingered, cold fingers wrapping around her skin like the tendrils of a shadow. His words seeped into her, poisoning her thoughts and drowning her sense of self. Maya felt herself being pulled deeper into the abyss of his control, the internal storm battling the one outside. The rain pummeled the windowpanes harder, and she wondered -- did the sky weep for her, or was the Earth itself trying to wash away the sin of what was about to happen within these walls.

“Do not fear,” Damien said softly, his voice a seductive promise. “Fear is for the weak. You are strong. You are mine.”

The final word – mine – struck her like a blow, sending an icy shiver down her spine. This was not love. It was not protection. It was ownership. Maya was no longer her own. She had become an object, a vessel for his need to dominate, to twist even the purest faith into submission.

The room fell silent then, save for the relentless rhythm of the rain and the distant rumble of thunder, Damien smiled, triumphant, as the storm outside began to settle – its rage finally spent.

But within Maya’s heart, a new storm was brewing.

A GRIM REALITY UNFOLDS

The chilling narrative above could easily come from the pages of a novel, yet it echoes the real-life accounts of countless victims of abuse in religious settings.

Betrayed by her faith: Ex-KOJC member details years of Quiboloy's sexual abuse

THE KINGDOM OF JESUS CHRIST

One such testimony is that of Teresita Valdehueza, a Kingdom of Jesus Christ (KOJC) member, who recounted her harrowing experiences at a Senate hearing during a stormy day – an apt reflection of the turbulence in her life. She detailed the years of abuse she endured under the hands of Davao-based pastor Apollo Quiboloy, the self-proclaimed Appointed Son of God.  Her words were piercing as she relived the horror:

“Sleeping beside a man I believed to be chosen by God was for me a great privilege, an opportunity for a sinner like me.” Valdehueza narrated.  “But what followed shattered my sense of faith and trust. Without a word, after turning off the light, [Quiboloy] embraced me, undressed me, and violated me with his lustful act that left me in shock and speechless.”

Quiboloy had turned his despicable actions into something sacred in the eyes of his followers, telling her, “This is the fulfillment of God’s revelation.”

A WIDESPREAD ISSUE: RELIGIOUS ABUSE

Sadly, the abuses perpetrated by spiritual leaders are not confined to fringe groups like Quiboloy’s KOJC. Mainstream religious institutions, including both Catholic and Protestant churches, have been marred by similar allegations of sexual abuse and exploitation.

THE CATHOLIC CHURCH

The Catholic Church has faced widespread scandals spanning decades, most notably the sexual abuse of minors and vulnerable adults by clergy. In the U.S., the issue came to the forefront in the 1990s, with thousands of victims stepping forward. Investigation revealed systemic abuse and cover-ups within the Church hierarchy, culminating in criminal prosecutions and massive financial settlements.

Pope says the Catholic Church must be ashamed of Belgium sexual abuse

The Boston Archdiocese scandal, exposed by investigative journalists, revealed how Church officials protected predator priests by moving them to different parishes rather than confronting the issue. The global reckoning that followed led to reforms within the Church, though the scars remain deep.

To date, the Catholic Church has paid billions in settlements to victims, and several dioceses have declared bankruptcy under the financial strain. Grand jury reports, such as those from Pennsylvania and New York, have exposed the shocking extent of the abuse and the institutional attempts to silence the victims.

 PROTESTANT CHURCHES

Protestant denominations have also been tainted by similar scandals. The Southern Baptist Convention, one of the largest Protestant groups in the U.S., has been rocked by revelations of sexual abuse over the past two decades. Investigations by media outlets uncovered over 700 cases of sexual misconduct involving Southern Baptist pastors, deacons, and volunteers – many of them involving children.

An independent investigation commissioned by the denomination revealed that the abuse claims were mishandled for decades, with leadership often protecting abusers or discouraging victims from coming forward.

Evangelicals need to focus on church's sexual abuse epidemic, not just Trump or drag queens - USA Today 

INDEPENDENT CHURCHES AND MINISTRIES

The problem isn’t limited to large denominations. Evangelical leader Bill Gothard, founder of the Institute of Basic Life Principles, faced multiple accusations of sexual harassment and abuse. Though his teachings promoted a strict Christian lifestyle, he used his authority to exploit followers. Gothard’s case, though less prominent, highlights the deep-rooted issues of sexual misconduct even in independent ministries.

COMMON PATTERNS IN RELIGIOUS ABUSE

These scandals share disturbingly common patterns: charismatic leaders abusing their spiritual authority to exploit followers sexually, emotionally, or financially. Institutions often prioritize their reputation, covering up misconduct rather than addressing it. Victims are frequently silenced, their pleas for help ignored or suppressed.

A CALL FOR VIGILANCE

A comprehensive study by cult expert Susan Raine emphasizes the need to focus on the dynamics of “power” and “grooming” within religious communities. Most abuse, she argues, comes not from strangers but from trusted individuals within a victim’s immediate environment – family, community leaders, or religious figures.

The findings urge society to move beyond the concept of “stranger danger” and acknowledge the threats closer to home. With each new story, the cracks in religious institutions grow wider. It is a sobering reminder of the need for constant vigilance, transparency, and justice for those who have been silenced for too long.

The storm, though calmed, is far from over.

Content & editing put together in collaboration with ChatGPT

Head photo courtesy of Everypixel.com

Still photos courtesy of philstar and freepik.dom

PHISHING SCAMS: LESSONS FROM "THE BEEKEEPER" AND MY BRUSH WITH FRAUD

 

Do you know how some movies just grab you from the opening shot? The Beekeeper did exactly that for me. From the moment it started, I was glued to my Turkish Airlines plane seat during our trip from Belgium to Texas, anticipating what would come. The mood was tense, but in a quiet, simmering way, like the calm before a storm.

The movie opens in a small, peaceful town –- a place that feels like home, with quaint houses and neighbors who know each other by name. And that’s when we meet Eloise Parker – this utterly warm and kind retired school teacher who is the epitome of grace. She lives for the simple joys in life – basking in the sunlit mornings in her garden and spending cozy evenings with her friends. You could almost feel the peace and warmth radiating from her scenes.

But then, bam! One day, she gets this seemingly harmless email -- the kind we all get, but we delete without a second thought – something about an account issue, asking her to click a link to verify her information. Watching it unfold on screen I felt a knot in my stomach. The email was all decked out with professional language, and official logos. Eloise, trusting and unsuspecting, fell right into the trap. I sat there, wanting to yell at the screen: Don’t click it! But of course, she does.

Beware of phishing

Ooh, the way the movie shows it – it’s not just a click. The moment she hit send, it was like the floor dropped from beneath her, and her whole life pivoted. The music shifts subtly, too, getting darker, and more ominous. It’s like watching a slow-motion car crash that you can’t stop. One minute, Eloise is still making tea in her cozy little kitchen, and the next, you see these shadowy figures on the other side of the screen, taking everything from her. It’s brutal. The audience feels her confusion and growing panic, as emails and phone calls from her bank start flooding in, asking if she authorized this or that transaction.

She tries to make sense of it all, calling her bank frantically, her hands trembling as she holds the phone. But it’s too late. Her life savings are gone. In an instant. The film doesn’t hold back – it makes you live through that horror with her. The feeling of helplessness, the crushing realization that her trust was weaponized against her.

What hit me the hardest was how personal this scam felt. It wasn’t just about the money. You could see in Eloise’s face that it was her dignity, her security, her peace of mind that was taken from her. She goes from being this joyful, almost grandmotherly figure, to a shell of herself. And we, the audience, are left sitting there, feeling the weight of her loss. It’s gut-wrenching.

It made me think about how easily anyone can fall prey to these kinds of scams. Three days ago, I found myself in a similar situation.

So, there I was, just casually surfing the internet, when suddenly this big Apple security warning exploded onto my laptop screen. It was one of those pop-ups that made your heart skip a beat.

Apple Security Warning used by scammers

“ACCESS TO THIS PC IS BLOCKED FOR SECURITY REASONS,” it blared, followed by a list of terrifying notifications:

• Email IDs
• Bank passwords
• Facebook logins
• Photos & documents

According to the message, my computer had been compromised by some Trojan spyware, and MacOS had detected adware capable of stealing my entire digital life. And, of course, it came with a dire warning: Call Apple Support immediately to fix this, or face the doom of identity theft and blocked access to your device!

Panic kicked in. My first instinct? I called the number on the screen. Yeah, I know – big mistake.

A sweet, charming voice greeted me on the other end of the line. She introduced herself as Charlene from Apple Support, and I felt a little reassured. She sounded so… professional. I told her about the scary message on my screen, and she told me to hang tight while she looped in the Apple “technical guys” for a report.

She asked me a few questions to “verify” my identity. You know, general stuff like if I was the laptop’s owner, and what other gadgets were connected to the WiFi at my location. I played along, but things got a little awkward when I casually mentioned I was just a guest at the house I was staying in – and that I was actually on vacation from the Philippines.

There was a brief pause on her end, but then Charlene came back with the supposed “technical report,” and that’s when things took a turn.

“Oh my gosh!” she gasped dramatically, her voice dripping with concern. “Seven hackers are attacking your system right now!” She then dropped the bombshell: “Our report shows that you’ve accessed four porn sites recently. Was that you?”

I couldn’t help but laugh. “Nope. Not me,” I said, feeling a little more confident now. Then she asked, “Do you have a credit card?”

“Nope.”

“Online banking?”

“None.”

“Any bank account?”

“Yeah, but I’m sorry to disappoint. I don’t have money. I’m a retiree living off my monthly pension from the Philippine government. I’m not worth hacking, trust me.”

There was a long silence. I could feel her frustration through the phone.

“Sir, we’re trying to help you here, but if you’re not willing to cooperate, we can’t resolve this issue,” she said, her tone sharp and irritated now.

It was at that moment I realized the tables had turned. They’d picked the wrong target – a guy with zero assets to his name (Could it be due to "riches" in my family name? lol) and no intention of falling for their phishing scam. I mean, seriously, I had nothing to lose. My wife holds the family's purse strings. I almost felt sorry for Charlene, stuck on the other end of the line, trying to salvage this failed scam.

She asked a few more desperate questions about my financials – bank names, deposits, etc. – but we both knew it was a lost cause. Finally, she muttered something about calling me back and hung up.

Just to be safe, I called actual Apple Support afterward. A very professional-sounding engineer named Justine ran a full system check on my laptop, confirming that it was perfectly fine – no malware, no hackers, no porn site history. Her final, crucial advice: Never call the numbers on those pop-ups.

In the end, what saved me? The simple, unvarnished truth – I don’t have big bucks in my name – funnily enough, turned out to be my best defense. They probably thought I was pulling their leg, but honestly, the joke was on them! And as it turns out, Jesus is right all along: The truth will set you free – even if that truth involves a monthly pension that makes you laugh (and cry).”

Content and editing put together in collaboration with ChatGPT

Head photo courtesy of Pixabay & The Beekeeper

DEAR AMERICAN FRIEND: A GOOD LESSON FROM THE PHILIPPINE ELECTION

 

I’ve been thinking about you and the weight of this upcoming election, and I wanted to share something from the heart.

As you sit there, reflecting on the U.S. presidential election that looms ahead, have you ever stopped to truly consider the power of your vote? You’ve likely heard it a thousand times – your vote matters – but, in a moment when your country feels more divided than ever, that statement has never been more crucial. The choice you make on election day doesn’t just set the tone for the next four years; it shapes the landscape for generations to come.

Take a moment to think about what’s at stake: policies that could either unite or deepen the divide in your nation, leaders who can inspire hope or ignite conflict. And here’s the thing -- the world is watching. The decision you make resonates far beyond America’s borders. Just recently, I found myself reflecting on the Philippine presidential election, and I realized there’s a good lesson in that election – one that you, as an American, simply cannot overlook.

So, what’s the good lesson? It’s simple: this time, more than ever, the future of America depends on how you decide to wield your ballot.

Narcissus and the Lake

Paulo Coelho’s The Alchemist, offers an unexpected twist on the myth of Narcissus – the young man so mesmerized by his reflection that he ultimately drowns in the lake. In Coelho’s version, after Narcissus’ death, the lake mourns not for the boy’s beauty, but for the fact that in Narcissus’ eyes, it saw its own reflection. This mutual admiration introduces a fresh take on the original tale – a theme of interconnectiveness that speaks to relationships of power, influence, and self-interest.

This story reminds me of the unique, sometimes controversial, dynamic between former U.S. President Donald Trump and former Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte. Headlines, like Trump hails ‘great relationship’ with Duterte (The Guardian) and Duterte says Trump deserves to be reelected (Reuters), underscore how their connection mirrored a mutual fascination, much like Narcissus and the lake.

 A Good Lesson from the Bible

Speaking of a good lesson, I took the liberty of drawing from a powerful line spoken by Jesus: No one is good – except God alone. While not diving deep into doctrinal meanings, I included good in this letter’s title as a nod toward seeking higher wisdom in making such important decisions.

I didn’t vote for Duterte, despite hailing from his home region of Mindanao. My decision was based on Luke 6:45: A good man brings good things out of the good stored up in his heart, and an evil man brings evil things out of the evil stored up in his heart. For the mouth speaks what the heart is full of. Duterte’s words, often highlighted by the international press, painted a picture far removed from the Christian values I hold dear. His inflammatory comments, like comparing himself to Hitler, and shocking remarks about women, journalists, world leaders, and even God, deeply troubled me.

On the other hand, Trump, too, has been no stranger to such rhetoric. From calling the media spies to inspiring hate with his speeches, the echoes of Duterte’s bold style are impossible to ignore. But here’s where the good lesson from the Philippines comes into play.

Who Should You Vote For?

In deciding who to support in the upcoming U.S. election, should Christian values be part of the equation? Absolutely. A recent analysis shows that 50% of Americans view the U.S. as a Christian nation, with the largest backing for this belief coming from white Christian conservatives.

So, here’s the problem: Who should you vote for in the upcoming election?

Let’s approach it with a system-thinking mindset. Consider the inputs, processes, outputs, and feedback we’ve seen before.

Input 1: Rodrigo Duterte

Process: Luke 6:45 – For the mouth speaks what the heart is full of.

Output: “Worst president ever?” (Inquirer columnist)

Feedback: The question mark awaits a potential International Criminal Court arrest warrant.

Input 2: Donald Trump

Process: Luke 6:45 – For the mouth speaks what the heart is full of.

Output: Labeled as “the most dangerous man in the world” by psychological experts and described as a fascist by a former U.S. Army general.

Feedback: Involved in thousands of lawsuits over decades, and still awaiting trial outcomes.

In closing, I leave you with this question once more: Who should you vote for in the coming election?

If you’re guided by Christian values, particularly as a white Christian conservative, then the answer may seem clear. But if you find yourself relying on the same inputs, expecting a different output or outcome, take a step back. As Einstein said, repeating the same actions while expecting a new result – that’s the very definition of insanity.

Whatever choice you make, let it be one made with wisdom, discernment, and a deep understanding of the future you wish to create for your country.

May God bless you, and God bless the U.S.A.!

Content and editing put together in collaboration with ChatGPT

Head collage photos courtesy of Amazon.com & American Philatelic Society

Still photos courtesy of The Indian Express, NBC News, Adobe Stock, CNBC, & Pixabay

ENGINEERS DO IT EXACTLY ... IN COOKING? WELL, THAT'S ANOTHER STORY

 

Remember the scene in Ratatouille when Linguini, the bumbling kitchen janitor, nervously attempts to cook soup, only to turn it into a disastrous concoction?

It’s chaotic, ingredients flying everywhere, and just when the mess seems beyond repair, Remy – the tiny rat with a flair for cooking – jumps in, saved the day, and transforms the chaos into a culinary masterpiece.

Remy in 2007 film Ratatouille

That scene always makes me laugh because it reminds me that cooking is never just about following a recipe to the letter. It’s about the balance between precision and creativity – between science and art. My kitchen adventures, though less catastrophic than Linguini’s, have taught me the same lesson.

My first venture into the culinary world happened when I was just five. Armed with a self-made slingshot, I took down with precision a small bird, a tamsi, perched atop a malunggay tree. Proud of my prize, I decided to cook it. I remembered how my mother once prepared chicken, with me assisting by holding its body and wings as she drained its blood after a swift cut to the neck. That vivid image was my guide.

So, I cooked the bird in the simplest way I could imagine – skewering it like a hotdog or marshmallow over a fire. The smell was divine, but the taste? That part escapes me now. Perhaps it was for the best.

For many years after that, cooking became a distant memory. Following our retirement, my wife Cher and I found ourselves with an empty nest. Our routine consisted of breakfast at Jollibee or McDonald’s, alternating between the two, while lunches and dinners were sourced from restaurants or the turo-turo stalls around the city. But monotony quickly set in. Finally, we agreed to start cooking at home, and I volunteered to take the reins.

As an engineer, precision has always been my mantra – one that I’ve worn proudly on a T-shirt during my corporate days, declaring, Engineers do it exactly. I approached cooking with the same mindset. Today, armed with Bing, my AI assistant; measuring cups & spoons, and a basic set of kitchenware, I've transformed myself into our household chef.

Twenty-something Ray

Fast forward to now and here in the US.

On the occasion of Ed’s birthday -- our gracious host – I took it upon myself to prepare one of my old favorites: mixed seafood with oyster sauce. It had been ages since I last made it, but I still remembered the recipe, with a little help from Bing. A simple query brought a recipe for four guests, but I had 15 to feed. No problem – Bing’s advice was straightforward: multiply the recipe by four. Easy enough.

Ed, Cher, and I went grocery shopping for prawns, crabs, squids, mussels, and everything else needed for the dish. But when we got to Walmart and Ranch Market, the biggest wok we could find wasn’t quite big enough. Back in the kitchen, this became a real challenge. Midway through, I had no choice but to split the dish into two pots. Despite this hiccup, the result was not bad. Though, amusingly, half of the dish remained untouched, giving us ample leftovers for the next few days.

               Cher in Walmart, Ed in white                     Ray in the kitchen

Ed offered a valuable lesson: I didn’t need to prepare enough for all 15 guests, especially with the abundance of catered dishes already on the table – lechon pork belly, beef brisket, grilled pork ribs & chicken wings, pork adobo, and vegetable salad – all vying for attention.

“Ray, let’s cook some chicken adobo,” Ed suggested one day, setting down eight pounds of chicken legs and thighs on the kitchen counter. I was game. After all, I’d made adobo countless times before. Again, I turned to Bing that rolled out a recipe for two pounds of chicken. Acting by default (senior moments?), I multiplied the quantities by four to accommodate our batch.

But in the heat of cooking, I realized something was off. What I’d made wasn’t adobo -- it was watery paksiw. The culprit? A tiny typo. I had accidentally entered 1-1/2 cups of water for a two-pound chicken instead of just half a cup. By multiplying this error by four, I added six cups of water instead of two.

As they say, Desperate times call for desperate measures. I drained the excess liquid, though it meant sacrificing some of the flavor. To compensate, I added pineapple chunks and juice to give the dish some extra zest.

The next day, with a sheepish grin, knowing I messed up the chicken adobo, Ed said, “We’ll drink some wine and grilled a pork belly.

                                                        Grill work in progress

I embarked on some revenge cooking – grilling three pounds of marinated pork belly. Double-checking every measurement, I’ve ensured no repeat of past errors. After dinner, Ed and I savored the delectable grilled pork belly as sumsuman, accompanied by a bottle of E & J XO brandy, while enjoying the live performances of Diana Krall and Chris Botti on the widescreen TV. Olé!

                                                            Ed & Ray chilling out

While Engineers do it exactly works perfectly for rocket ships, I’ve learned that cooking requires a touch of artistry. Precision might build rockets, but it’s creativity that brings flavor to the table.

As I wrap up, I can’t help but think of that classic Simpsons episode where Marge, ever the organized cook, hands Homer a precise, step-by-step recipe to make a dinner.

Marge: “Here, Homer. Just follow this step-by-step recipe exactly, and you’ll be fine.”

Homer (enthusiastically grabbing the recipe): “Got it, Marge! Step-by-step, no problem. How hard could it be?”

[CUT TO: The kitchen – a mess. Flour, sauces, and random ingredients are everywhere. Homer is stirring something unrecognizable in a pot.]

Homer (proudly): “I followed the recipe… mostly!”

Marge (looking horrified at the chaos): “Homer, this was supposed to be spaghetti. What is this?!”

Homer (shrugging, smiling): “I improvised! It’s… uh, SpagHomer!”

Cher, Ray, & Ed relishing the grilled pork belly with garden salad

 over a glass of brandy

Content & editing put together in collaboration with ChatGPT

Head photo courtesy of Freepik