Dining table and chairs. Refrigerator. Stove. Plates.
Forks & spoons. Glasses. Pots & pans. Cutting knives. Pressing iron.
Towels. Bed. Pillows. Sheets.
Question: What
are they for?
Dumb guess: Sales
promo?
Clue: It’s the
month of June.
Dumber guess: Summer
sales promo?
Another clue: June
bride.
Dumbest guess: Summer
sales promo for bridesmaids?
Answer: They are
essential things inside the apartment of the newlyweds.
Did I miss anything on the list? You may ask, “How
about a sofa?” Good question. Sad to say, the newlywed couple’s budget is tight.
While he still needs to buy a tool kit and a deadbolt to secure their main
door, meanwhile, she longs for a TV and indoor plants. For sure, what they
bring in their apartment are the most important things they need to keep their
bodies and souls together.
The above list of home essentials stands for the
newlywed couple’s physiological needs – the health and biological requirements
for them to survive. On top of that list, having an apartment that will “keep
the wolf from the door” – equates with their need for safety. The couple go
along with the idea that their apartment is not yet ready to play host to
visitors, hence, holding off the sofa – reflecting their social need (they put
aside for the meantime) for love and belonging in a community. Physiological,
safety, and social – the first three levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.
I hope my playful opening above has invited your
interest to this bookish subject – Maslow’s hierarchy of needs.
MASLOW’S HIERARCHY OF NEEDS
Maslow’s hierarchy of needs is one of the best-known
theories of motivation. Introducing the concept in his 1943 paper, “A Theory of
Human Motivation,” and in his book “Motivation and Personality,” Abraham
Maslow, a psychologist, believed that our actions are motivated by the innate
human needs that scale up from basic to complex levels in a form of a pyramid:
physiological, safety, social, esteem, and self-actualization. Interestingly,
our newlywed couple lay the cornerstone of their married life at the bottom levels
– physiological and safety – hopefully not to be stuck there for the rest of
their married life.
In the political context, Maslow’s model played a crucial
role in the 2007 election in Australia. Christine Jackman, author, journalist,
and communication consultant wrote a chapter, ”The Future Guy,” in the 2009
book “The Best of Australian Political Writing,” giving an account of the political
planning behind the Opposition’s wresting the government from the Coalition.
She explained how an advertising executive, engaged in preparing for the
election, applied Maslow’s model in shaping the strategy.
“The strategy worked,” reported in an article by TPS: A hub for the fifth estate. “The recasting of Maslow’s hierarchical pyramid of human needs into the context of federal politics, and using it to guide election strategy, was a winner.”
FIND A NEED AND FILL IT
In the 2016 Philippine presidential election, PRRD unknowingly
put into effect Maslow’s model. Let me explain by reiterating my previous
article, “Looking at PH Political Landscape with Management Analytical Eyeglasses.”
Beyond the shadow of a doubt, even his critics would
concede that the election campaign turned out well for PRRD who found in the
hearts of Pinoys their vital needs and then filled it – a back to basic
find-a-need-and-fill-it marketing management principle. What had been the Pinoys’
needs? According to Borgen Project – a non-profit organization addressing
poverty and hunger:
1. Over a third of the rural Pinoys are impoverished.
2. At least two-thirds of poor households are headed
by no higher than an elementary educated individual.
3. Four out of 10 poor urban families do not have
decent living conditions.
The above three conditions, among others, have consigned
the majority of Pinoys to the bottom level of Maslow’s model – the physiological
need. What’s more, add to that these PRRD spine-chilling words:
“Violence is my strength…there is a need because there’s
a [drug] war, and with that kind of problem in my hands now… until the last
dragon is killed, this campaign will continue to the very last day of my term…there
must be fear.”
Such direful words had enkindled fear which induced added
need among Pinoys – to be safe and secure – ultimately entrenching the poor Pinoys
in the twin bottom levels of Maslow’s hierarchy of needs – the physiological
and safety needs.
Then, PRRD filled such needs with this campaign pledge:
“If elected president, give me about 3 to six months,
I will get rid of corruption, drugs, and criminality.”
At the end of his term, having taken Pinoys for a
ride, PRRD admitted: “I was really wrong.” As Lao Tzu said: “There is no illusion
greater than fear.”
SQUARE PEG IN A ROUND HOLE
In the meantime, PBBM in his inaugural address said:
“When my call for UNITY started to resonate with you,
it did so because it echoed your yearning, mirrored your sentiments, and
expressed your hopes for family, for country and for a better future.” (Underscoring
mine)
I don’t think so for two reasons.
First, PBBM followers’ conduct during and even after the election campaign has
been so fiercely damaging that the painful wounds may take too long to heal to
achieve the Unity PBBM has aspired for the whole nation as indicated below:
“Robredo’s quotes have been mangled, twisted, [or]
fabricated to make her look like she is spouting nonsense. She has been called,
rather harshly, Madumb, lutang, tanga, utal-utal, [among
others].” (Tsek.ph study)
“Trolls still targeting Robredo past election” (Inquirer
headline)
Second, the majority of the poor Filipinos are still stuck
at the bottom level of Maslow’s model – in the physiological need.
“43 percent of Filipinos rated themselves as ‘poor’
while 34 percent felt ‘borderline poor’.” (SWS)
Practically, 3 in 4 Filipinos have felt "poor." While stuck in the
bottom level of physiological need, poor and hungry Filipinos could not think
much of the intangible value of Unity at the upper level of Maslow’s hierarchy
of needs. As the Kurdish proverb goes:
“Empty words [like Unity] will not fill an empty
stomach.”
Interestingly enough, put side by side, while PRRD’s campaign pledge was like a square peg in a square hole, in contrast, PBBM’s call is like a square peg in a round hole.
Head still photo courtesy of Diva Plavalaguna at pexelsdotcom
No comments:
Post a Comment